{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"08bdc962-4f4f-453b-b8b7-3cc8c1470fc4","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"b8a844047cfaffe2b3c8ad263a26c17d8c2b455523e791ccd2ed08c562e8f887","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","subagents":3,"tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"590bb5862b06620daabb3fb7db62c17240e3ad5064a748ca42c251a7680e0a5d","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","subagents":3,"tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"795bcf23af25c9475cf12da4ee4097fb409f9349cbdeaf18f1dfdfe86558177c","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"b89279670f5a00f5d26286edee00c97dd158b997031350a01cafe6e0329ad227","skillId":"audit-judge","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"b89279670f5a00f5d26286edee00c97dd158b997031350a01cafe6e0329ad227","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"eb9f4a143882f238d8fd1f3deb18a5a5583ec76fddc1c52fcc213b70a3564e49","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","subagents":3,"tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"71ceb557a1b27a6a37c80050b68c618a31d526225483732ce34f6acf91d596b4","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","subagents":3,"tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"bc5bfc8455464381f2db18badb2b55cf8bec1e535c019349a0378fa990741171","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"f7a6c20621f0ecfc7af8b3ab3464b1f8fd92922f02dcd9f982dee2d0da9767ad","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"15b04fc8f60521936b9e2b37c09a804685ec689fc98cd5b04510d986d3106a15","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"15b04fc8f60521936b9e2b37c09a804685ec689fc98cd5b04510d986d3106a15","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"edcb32a9e756df7188837a5be99042555e3a07119cd1546d43e2a7280ba214f0","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a666d56372bf1fc7a2769322b7449d22b9d368536c320f3b5e567686215a6a06","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"606842ccca0e7c5d3017a54684625438eab9b351eb51dcf0cf88c43d1ea41464","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"606842ccca0e7c5d3017a54684625438eab9b351eb51dcf0cf88c43d1ea41464","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A custom token: CryptoPunkin (PUNKINS).\nToken name: CryptoPunkin\nToken symbol: PUNKINS\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"7252aa63f0b5157d134463300ae9aaa0e82aa31db39aaf189a3065ce4c2a699a","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"08bdc962-4f4f-453b-b8b7-3cc8c1470fc4","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-2748-cryptopunkin"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51509","feedbackHash":"e34fa290bfacb6c1cc275d67d2a32822934c8949f351a21880e50327242f342f","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"b8a844047cfaffe2b3c8ad263a26c17d8c2b455523e791ccd2ed08c562e8f887","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51493","feedbackHash":"365481d0627a0a9b9dfc9426fbd8f084981fb15416dc2367725ee0e4fef24317","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"590bb5862b06620daabb3fb7db62c17240e3ad5064a748ca42c251a7680e0a5d","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51481","feedbackHash":"ca01c8b791db81dd6ec6cfb5f6c8ad618de56b0dc8dbf08e6ebff1062359ed6b","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"795bcf23af25c9475cf12da4ee4097fb409f9349cbdeaf18f1dfdfe86558177c","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52628","feedbackHash":"baa0b4c908aa55c23d2297c27b8f122c837de48353147328b2c73cf3849072c1","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"eb9f4a143882f238d8fd1f3deb18a5a5583ec76fddc1c52fcc213b70a3564e49","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51485","feedbackHash":"54d57180851ed5215ba902306d415aaf7e06275b03a40211ca453f4301a09a39","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"71ceb557a1b27a6a37c80050b68c618a31d526225483732ce34f6acf91d596b4","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52262","feedbackHash":"afb430654ae634ac12d17fdf7423ab1ab33e335ecac3aad92234043243d1fb51","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"f7a6c20621f0ecfc7af8b3ab3464b1f8fd92922f02dcd9f982dee2d0da9767ad","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51001","feedbackHash":"84c4542b07ce51ec7a1e7b6c2497cc3277beeeaad5c139817fb8b97eaeb84402","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"edcb32a9e756df7188837a5be99042555e3a07119cd1546d43e2a7280ba214f0","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"54231","feedbackHash":"c1f44b31fcbc87e4296c9d3c624729d45cf2b4050da86c9bbc92393063fa0ec1","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"a666d56372bf1fc7a2769322b7449d22b9d368536c320f3b5e567686215a6a06","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"c88e424842bd589eeee44b15488872a7dffa5a62816c2bdd47b239d3c95b1f6b","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"dd3018ab6b18e7bc","findings":[],"hash":"352542df12d589378d300d0ebcab1933321fe030e42477fc840d4eb80105c2e2","nodeId":"0a726b6d-34f2-49e1-a2e4-7934768eab94","outcome":"failed","summary":"Claude Code can't use your Claude subscription, usually because a payment is past due · Pay or renew at https://claude.ai/… (if you just paid, try again shortly), or use an Anthropic API key instead","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":0,"inputTokens":0,"model":null,"outputTokens":0,"runtime":"claude","turns":1,"wallClockMs":1300}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"74979c69cdd583ad","findings":[],"hash":"590bb5862b06620daabb3fb7db62c17240e3ad5064a748ca42c251a7680e0a5d","nodeId":"0a726b6d-34f2-49e1-a2e4-7934768eab94","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects I could reproduce. `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list and a coverage row for each of the three entry points, all marked `holds`. I changed no other file.\n\n**What I checked** (control flow: the Execution Trace, Periphery and First Principles guides) in `src/CryptoPunkin.sol`, `src/interfaces/IERC20.sol` and the deploy script:\n- **`approve`**: it refuses `address(0)` as spender, overwrites the allowance and emits `Approval`. It calls no other contract, so there is nothing to re-enter. The approve race is standard ERC-20 behaviour and the code documents it.\n- **`transfer`**: the zero-address and balance checks run before the `unchecked` block. A transfer to yourself leaves the balance unchanged. All balances always add up to the fixed supply of 1e27, so the addition can't overflow. There is no fee, so the launch transfers (factory to distributor, distributor to claimants, deposits to and withdrawals from the pool) arrive in full.\n- **`transferFrom`**: it only spends the caller's own allowance from `from`. An unlimited allowance (the maximum value) is never reduced, and a shortfall reverts before the unchecked subtraction. A transfer from `address(0)` is refused twice: it has no allowance, and `_transfer` rejects it. If a balance check fails, the whole call reverts, so the allowance change is undone too.\n- **Supply and permissions**: the supply is a compile-time constant, credited once in the constructor to whoever deploys it, which at launch is the factory. The constructor takes no arguments. There is no mint, burn, owner, pause, `receive` or `fallback`.\n- **Forbidden opcodes**: I scanned the reachable code of the compiled contract (1,668 bytes) the same way the launch's protected test does. It contains no `DELEGATECALL`, `CALLCODE` or `SELFDESTRUCT`.\n- **Static analysis**: Aderyn's one note, about the large number on line 39, is the intended supply constant and not a defect. Slither reported nothing.\n\nThe project's own 39 tests pass. I did not run the launch's protected test files: the harness and pool-seeding contracts they import are not in this tree. A clean review does not prove the code has no defects.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":160640,"inputTokens":10,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":2846,"runtime":"claude","turns":5,"wallClockMs":36247}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"234a4a00ca903cb9","findings":[],"hash":"71ceb557a1b27a6a37c80050b68c618a31d526225483732ce34f6acf91d596b4","nodeId":"b21f3592-a9b6-4063-a64c-418937586d17","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects in the permissions area of CryptoPunkin. `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list and a coverage row for each of the three entry points, all marked `holds`. The existing project tests pass (39 of 39), and I changed no files apart from writing that findings file.\n\nI checked `src/CryptoPunkin.sol` against the Access Control, Trust Gap and Asymmetry guides:\n\n- **Access control:** there is no owner, admin, minter, pause, blocklist, exempt list, upgrade path, `receive` or `fallback`. The constructor takes no arguments and gives no role to anyone. After deployment, the only stored state is balances and allowances, and only the holder's own call can change them.\n- **Trust gap:** the token makes no external calls and trusts no address. The factory gets the supply only as an ordinary balance, so it has no special power to move or freeze anyone else's tokens. The launch flows (factory to distributor, distributor to claimants, seeding and swapping through the pool manager) move exactly the amount requested.\n- **Asymmetry:**\n  - `approve` sets only the caller's own allowance and refuses `address(0)` as spender.\n  - `transferFrom` spends only the caller's allowance from `from` and reverts when it is too small. An allowance of the maximum value is treated as unlimited, as in OpenZeppelin.\n  - `_transfer` checks both zero addresses and the sender's balance before its unchecked arithmetic. A transfer to yourself leaves your balance unchanged, and a zero-value transfer succeeds as the standard requires.\n- **Supply:** the total is a fixed constant of 1e27 minor units (1,000,000,000 tokens with 18 decimals), credited once to `msg.sender` in the constructor. Nothing can mint or burn afterwards.\n- **Static analysis:** slither reported nothing. Aderyn's one low item is the \"large numeric literal\" at line 39, which is just the supply constant `1_000_000_000 * 10 ** 18`, so it is not a defect.\n\nThere are no `launch.json` or application contracts in this tree, so there was nothing there to review. I could not run the protected launch tests: they need the launch environment variables and `src/` files (`LaunchLiquidity` and others) that this repository doesn't have. I checked the token against what those tests require by reading it instead.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":121148,"inputTokens":8,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":2061,"runtime":"claude","turns":4,"wallClockMs":24303}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3f91b58cf7cd2d45","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"This is a defect in the delivered test suite, not in the token. The fuzz test remaps `from == address(this)` to CAROL (line 103) but leaves `to` unconstrained, so the fuzzer can pick `to == address(this)`, the contract that deployed the token in setUp and therefore holds SUPPLY - seeded before the transfer. Line 112 then expects balanceOf(to) == amount, and line 113 expects balanceOf(address(this)) == SUPPLY - seeded, both of which are false for that receiver. Forge's fuzzer draws test-contract addresses from its dictionary, so the case comes up regularly: the first `forge test` run on this tree with a fresh cache failed after 226 runs. The README states the tests \"hold for any seed\"; they do not. The token itself conserves balances on exactly this input (verified: sender debited by amount, holder credited by amount, sum unchanged). Fix: remap `to == address(this)` to a fixed actor the same way `from` is, or compute the expected receiver balance from its pre-transfer balance.","line":112,"path":"test/CryptoPunkin.edges.t.sol","reproduction":"From a clean cache (`rm -rf cache/fuzz`), run `forge test --match-path test/CryptoPunkin.edges.t.sol --match-test testFuzz_anyPairConservesBalances --fuzz-seed 0xf87b583cfd738e58befa6c8f8e1fd7bfb42fafff42d2751729a756d0e57ac650`. Expected: PASS for any seed, as the README claims. Actual: FAIL \"assertEq failed: receiver credited exactly (999999999999999999999999990 != 0)\" with counterexample from=0x5712A (or 0xCA201), to=0x7FA9385bE102ac3EAc297483Dd6233D62b3e1496 (the test contract), seeded=10, amount=10593 -> bound gives 2. Direct replay against the token: transfer(0x5712A, 10) from the holder, then prank(0x5712A) transfer(holder, 2): balanceOf(0x5712A)=8, balanceOf(holder)=SUPPLY-10+2, sum=SUPPLY. The token is correct; the test's expectation of balanceOf(to)==2 is not. Seeds 11, 22, 33, 44, 55 pass, so the failure depends on the seed the verifier uses.","severity":"low","snippet":"        if (from != to) assertEq(token.balanceOf(to), amount, \"receiver credited exactly\");","title":"testFuzz_anyPairConservesBalances asserts a wrong receiver balance when `to` is the supply-holding test contract, so `forge test` fails on some seeds"}],"hash":"795bcf23af25c9475cf12da4ee4097fb409f9349cbdeaf18f1dfdfe86558177c","nodeId":"93f03cde-cf80-4295-a3cc-6cecae5e40dd","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and `.imd-findings.json` is written with one finding and five coverage rows. No files in the tree were changed; the scratch test and fuzz cache were removed.\n\n**Specialist findings.** All four specialists and the test writer reported nothing. There was nothing to reproduce, merge, or drop.\n\n**My own pass found one defect, in the test suite, not the token.** The fuzz test in `test/CryptoPunkin.edges.t.sol` at line 112 asserts the receiver's balance equals the transferred amount, but it never excludes the test contract itself as the receiver. That contract deployed the token and holds the whole supply, so on seeds where the fuzzer picks it the test fails. The very first `forge test` run on this tree failed this way, and the README's claim that the tests hold for any seed is false. I replayed the counterexample against the token directly and the balances conserve exactly, so the token is correct. Severity low. The reproduction in the file gives the exact seed and inputs.\n\n**Entry points verified as holding:**\n- `approve` rejects the zero spender, overwrites the allowance, and emits.\n- `transfer` checks the zero receiver and the balance, moves exactly the requested amount with no fee or exempt list, and handles self-transfer correctly in the unchecked block.\n- `transferFrom` spends only the caller's own allowance, leaves a max allowance untouched, and the allowance write is undone when the inner transfer reverts.\n\n**Launch floor checks also pass.** Supply is a compile-time constant of 1e27 minted once to msg.sender, matching the manifest's totalSupply, decimals and empty constructorArgs. A scratch test mirroring the protected floor's reachable-opcode scan found no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT, and both runtime and creation code are well under the size limits. Static analysis leads were a large-literal note on the supply constant and nothing from Slither; neither is a defect.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":520590,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":11362,"runtime":"claude","turns":25,"wallClockMs":170635}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"a10dbe2f53647e4b1da6a78e6150b5ff9f06b2d7407819bbccc4768d41f98484","device":"a0f92fec784312b7","findings":[],"hash":"a666d56372bf1fc7a2769322b7449d22b9d368536c320f3b5e567686215a6a06","nodeId":"4771ac11-910a-40ef-a977-d15b602da2b9","outcome":"completed","summary":"`forge test` passes with the verifier's fuzz seed: 52 tests, none failing. I didn't find any defects in `src/CryptoPunkin.sol`, so I didn't write `.imd-findings.json`.\n\n**What I added (two files under `test/`; the earlier tests are unchanged):**\n\n- **`test/CryptoPunkin.invariant.t.sol`**: invariant tests over random call sequences. A helper contract deploys the token (so it starts with the full supply) and makes random transfers, approvals and `transferFrom` calls between five accounts. Some calls are meant to fail: amounts one token-unit over the limit, the zero address as receiver or spender, and missing allowances. It keeps its own record of every balance and allowance. Before each call it predicts whether the call should succeed and, if not, which error it should give. Any mismatch stops the run as a failure. After every sequence, four properties are checked:\n  - The total supply never changes.\n  - The five accounts together hold the whole supply, and the zero address and the token itself hold nothing.\n  - Every balance and allowance matches the helper's record.\n  - The token holds no ether.\n\n  These run 256 sequences of 64 calls each (16,384 calls in total), set in the test file. I checked that the runner really does fail when the helper reverts, using a deliberately failing throwaway test. A fixed-sequence test also confirms the helper reaches every success and failure path.\n- **`test/CryptoPunkin.edges.t.sol`**: 11 edge-case tests, including two fuzz tests. They cover:\n  - a zero-value `transferFrom` with no allowance\n  - an unlimited allowance that is still limited by the balance\n  - moving the whole supply twice on one unlimited allowance\n  - an allowance one below the maximum being spent normally\n  - `transferFrom` to yourself, and approving yourself\n  - a transfer of the maximum possible number reverting cleanly rather than overflowing\n  - tokens sent to the token's own address staying there\n  - fuzzed sender and receiver pairs, including sending to yourself\n  - failed `transferFrom` calls changing nothing\n\n**Points to know:**\n- **Tokens sent to the token contract are stuck.** There's no way to recover them. That's normal for an ERC-20 with no owner and isn't a defect, so I recorded it in a test rather than as a finding.\n- **Runtime:** the invariant tests take about 100 seconds, which is most of the run time.\n- **Not committed:** the two files are in the working tree for the upload. The brief didn't ask for a commit, so I didn't make one.","treeHash":"2ed23389cfd638a731a78b99db8f9c2f33cb77c9","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":378657,"inputTokens":20,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":13711,"runtime":"claude","turns":12,"wallClockMs":367707}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"74a99f640688d37b","findings":[],"hash":"b8a844047cfaffe2b3c8ad263a26c17d8c2b455523e791ccd2ed08c562e8f887","nodeId":"b35cb8aa-184c-4619-8db1-fab7fd363da8","outcome":"completed","summary":"The findings file is valid and the working tree is unchanged apart from the gitignored scratch test and the findings file itself.\n\n**Result: no defects found in the economics area.** The review is recorded in `.imd-findings.json` with an empty findings list and seven coverage rows, one for each of the three entry points plus four invariant and deployment rows.\n\n**What the code is.** CryptoPunkin is a dependency-free ERC-20 with two storage mappings and no other state. The constructor credits a compile-time constant supply to the deployer and nothing can mint, burn, pause, block, tax or upgrade afterwards. The compiled ABI contains only the ERC-20 functions and a public supply constant.\n\n**What I checked, by guide:**\n\n- **Economic Security.** No external dependency, oracle or callback exists, so nothing can be broken or sandwiched. No privileged actor exists after deployment, so the factory, distributor and requester are ordinary holders. ERC-20 compliance matches OpenZeppelin v5 semantics, including the zero-address reverts and unlimited allowance at the maximum value.\n- **Invariant.** The sum of balances equals the constant supply. The only unmatched credit is the constructor, and every later path debits and credits the same value. A 256-run stateful fuzz over 40 mixed transfer and transferFrom steps, including self-transfers and zero values, kept the sum constant. Self-transfer inside the unchecked block conserves balance.\n- **Flow Gap.** A probe imitating the v4 PoolManager sync and settle delta credited exactly the seed and the sell amount, and the take path paid out exactly. Transfer returns true, so the manager's require passes. The swarm share and claims arrive whole.\n\n**Static analysis leads.** Slither reported nothing. Aderyn's large-numeric-literal note is the supply constant, which is compile-time evaluated and equals the manifest supply exactly, so it is not a defect.\n\n**Checks that ran.** The project's own 39 tests pass. My scratch suite of 5 tests under `test/scratch/` passes and is not part of the submission. No proof files were needed since nothing reached critical or high.\n\n**Trust assumptions, not defects.** The ERC-20 approve overwrite race is inherent to the standard and documented by the author. Tokens sent to the contract's own address are stranded with no rescue path, which is standard behaviour for a token with no admin.\n\n**Not reached.** Nothing within the assigned area was left unverified. The protected floor tests that drive the real PoolManager could not be run here because they depend on the harness's environment variables and vendored v4 sources, so I reproduced their balance-delta logic with a probe instead.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":609071,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":13407,"runtime":"claude","turns":28,"wallClockMs":196867}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"764cd99b4c628a47","findings":[],"hash":"eb9f4a143882f238d8fd1f3deb18a5a5583ec76fddc1c52fcc213b70a3564e49","nodeId":"ea904a85-dc2c-44ec-92d7-4bdee157657e","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and the result is clean. The findings file holds an empty list and a six-row coverage record, the scratch tests are removed, and no tracked file changed.\n\n**What I reviewed.** The token in `src/CryptoPunkin.sol` against the Senior Auditor's Mindset and the Math Precision, Boundary and Numerical Gap guides. The contract has no division, no scale conversion, no downcast, no external call, no payable path and no sentinel branch other than the zero-address checks and the max-allowance sentinel. That leaves the two unchecked blocks and the edges of each entry point, which I traced by hand and then exercised with a scratch Foundry suite.\n\n**What held, with the inputs I used:**\n- **Unchecked subtraction in both `_transfer` and `transferFrom`** is guarded by a strict less-than revert immediately before it. A self-transfer of 6 from a balance of 5 and a max-uint value against the full supply both revert with the expected custom error.\n- **Unchecked addition to the receiver** cannot wrap because the sum of all balances is the constant 1e27, far below 2^128. A random 32-step sequence of transfers and transferFroms conserved that sum across 2000 fuzz runs.\n- **Self-transfer inside the unchecked block** re-reads the slot it just wrote, so balance is unchanged for every fuzzed held and value pair, through both `transfer` and `transferFrom`.\n- **The unlimited-allowance sentinel** matches only the exact max value. An allowance of max minus one is decremented, and a max-value transferFrom under an unlimited allowance reverts on balance with the allowance untouched.\n- **Zero-value paths** take the same code as non-zero ones. A zero transferFrom without allowance moves nothing and spends nothing, matching OpenZeppelin v5 and EIP-20.\n- **Supply constant** is exactly 1e27 with no compile-time truncation. The aderyn large-numeric-literal line is style only.\n- **Launch floor**, outside my area but checked for severity: the reachable runtime has no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT, is under the EIP-170 limit, and refuses ether and unknown selectors.\n\nThe project's own 39 tests also pass. Nothing in my area was left unreached, and the three listed entry points each carry a `holds` row with its reason.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":373736,"inputTokens":194,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":10633,"runtime":"claude","turns":17,"wallClockMs":146388}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"29d3935fa657bb1d227798ba02359bd534c773f397fb645ef40346bd7ae96fac","device":"6156e0902980b6f9","findings":[],"hash":"edcb32a9e756df7188837a5be99042555e3a07119cd1546d43e2a7280ba214f0","nodeId":"0869082a-643a-4ee2-97c9-48b2f2f2e0bb","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [launch.json](/var/lib/imd/seat-1676/work/08bdc962-4f4f-453b-b8b7-3cc8c1470fc4/0869082a-643a-4ee2-97c9-48b2f2f2e0bb/launch.json) matching CryptoPunkin’s constructor, exact supply, pool settings, and economics.\n\n`forge build` and all 39 tests passed using scratch-local Solidity 0.8.26 and the required fuzz seed. Only the manifest changed outside scratch.","treeHash":"9175967602a1aa73f62b9607a7e16bd3839ad498","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":445824,"inputTokens":35139,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","outputTokens":6024,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":134679}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"689a400a7b1eeb993980ac2fabef437a61d00093eec5b0f00ee93d5736214b43","device":"28e346843ec15530","findings":[],"hash":"f7a6c20621f0ecfc7af8b3ab3464b1f8fd92922f02dcd9f982dee2d0da9767ad","nodeId":"fbfa328d-c112-496d-8351-facf10f3aca3","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete, but I could not run any of the checks: this session's Bash sandbox rejects every command before it starts (`apply-seccomp: write /proc/self/setgroups ... Permission denied`, even for `forge --version`), and reads outside the repository are blocked, so I could not vendor forge-std or OpenZeppelin either. I wrote the project to be dependency-free so the verifier can build it offline, and reviewed every file by hand instead of compiling.\n\n**What was built**\n\n- `src/CryptoPunkin.sol`: contract `CryptoPunkin`, name `CryptoPunkin`, symbol `PUNKINS`, 18 decimals. The constructor takes no arguments and mints the whole supply to `msg.sender` once, which is the factory under the launch. `totalSupply()` is a compile-time constant, so there is no mint, burn, owner, pause, blocklist, fee, fallback, delegatecall or selfdestruct. Reverts use OpenZeppelin v5 custom error names.\n- `src/interfaces/IERC20.sol`: the ERC-20 interface with metadata.\n- `test/utils/TestBase.sol`: a small cheatcode interface at forge's cheatcode address plus pure-Solidity assertions and a non-rejecting `bound`, replacing forge-std.\n- `test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol`: 32 tests covering metadata, the one-time mint to whichever address deploys, transfer and approve and transferFrom success paths with events, every revert path with exact error data, rejection of admin and mint selectors from both the deployer and a stranger, and five fuzz tests for conservation and allowance arithmetic.\n- `script/DeployCryptoPunkin.s.sol` and `test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol`: a reviewable deploy script whose `deploy()` is tested directly and reads no environment.\n- `foundry.toml`: `solc = \"0.8.26\"`, `bytecode_hash = \"none\"`, optimizer at 200 runs, cancun, no ffi or fs permissions.\n- `README.md`: behaviour, assumptions, manifest values (supply `1e27` minor units, no constructor arguments), nothing to set after launch, and operational responsibilities.\n\n**What is unverified**\n\n- `forge build`, `forge test` and `forge fmt --check` did not run here. In the manual review I found and fixed one definite compiler error (`@notice` on private constants) and removed one test that depended on `expectEmit` across a contract creation, which I could not confirm. The remaining risk is a cheatcode signature or overload mismatch I could not catch by reading.\n- Nothing is committed: git is also unreachable without a working shell, so the working tree holds the deliverable for the harness to pick up.\n\nSupply table, for the manifest step:\n\n| Field | Value |\n|---|---|\n| token.contract | `CryptoPunkin` |\n| token.decimals | 18 |\n| token.totalSupply | 1000000000000000000000000000 |\n| token.constructorArgs | none |","treeHash":"e21817147e5250efe96c32af185cba032588c44c","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":636359,"inputTokens":354,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":45794,"runtime":"claude","turns":35,"wallClockMs":565225}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":931,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 8 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 859.02ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":7641,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 2 tests for test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol:DeployCryptoPunkinTest\n[PASS] test_deployMintsSupplyToTheScriptContract() (gas: 1063802)\n[PASS] test_deployTwiceGivesTwoIndependentTokens() (gas: 1465766)\nSuite result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 12.52ms (438.69µs CPU time)\n\nRan 11 tests for test/CryptoPunkin.edges.t.sol:CryptoPunkinEdgesTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_anyPairConservesBalances(address,address,uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 151198, ~: 154235)\n[PASS] testFuzz_failedTransferFromChangesNothing(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 155568, ~: 158073)\n[PASS] test_allowanceOneBelowMaxIsFinite() (gas: 115610)\n[PASS] test_maxValueTransferRevertsWithoutOverflow() (gas: 33135)\n[PASS] test_ownerCanSpendOwnBalanceAfterApprovingItself() (gas: 115363)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferAboveBalanceReverts() (gas: 84976)\n[PASS] test_tokensSentToTheTokenItselfAreStuckButCounted() (gas: 65542)\n[PASS] test_transferFromToSelfSpendsAllowanceKeepsBalance() (gas: 145937)\n[PASS] test_unlimitedAllowanceMovesTheWholeSupplyRepeatedly() (gas: 223213)\n[PASS] test_unlimitedAllowanceStillBoundedByBalance() (gas: 146682)\n[PASS] test_zeroValueTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 50855)\nSuite result: ok. 11 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 12.63ms (22.14ms CPU time)\n\nRan 37 tests for test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol:CryptoPunkinTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_allowanceIsPerOwnerSpenderPair(address,address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 66699, ~: 66867)\n[PASS] testFuzz_approveThenTransferFrom(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 136861, ~: 137972)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferAboveBalanceReverts(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 90052, ~: 90342)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferConservesSupply(address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 98144, ~: 98405)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromAboveAllowanceReverts(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 95455, ~: 95712)\n[PASS] test_approveDoesNotRequireBalance() (gas: 57723)\n[PASS] test_approveOverwritesNotAccumulates() (gas: 120953)\n[PASS] test_approveRevertsForZeroSpender() (gas: 30302)\n[PASS] test_approveSetsAllowanceAndEmits() (gas: 71913)\n[PASS] test_constructorMintsWholeSupplyToDeployer() (gas: 17597)\n[PASS] test_deployerHasNoSpecialPowerOverHolders() (gas: 91437)\n[PASS] test_eachDeploymentHasItsOwnSupply() (gas: 21742)\n[PASS] test_interfaceConformance() (gas: 16918)\n[PASS] test_metadata() (gas: 17609)\n[PASS] test_noMintOrAdminSelectorIsAnswered() (gas: 766525)\n[PASS] test_rejectsPlainEtherAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 47965)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferFromRequiresAllowance() (gas: 85323)\n[PASS] test_supplyGoesToTheDeployingContractNotTheTestOrOrigin() (gas: 261114)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsOneBillionWithEighteenDecimals() (gas: 28907)\n[PASS] test_transferChainsBetweenHolders() (gas: 191594)\n[PASS] test_transferFromExactAllowanceLeavesZero() (gas: 172960)\n[PASS] test_transferFromOnlySpendsTheCallersOwnAllowance() (gas: 136603)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsAboveAllowance() (gas: 132371)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsAboveBalanceEvenWithAllowance() (gas: 142094)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsFromZeroAddress() (gas: 33637)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 85304)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWithoutAllowance() (gas: 85288)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSpendsAllowance() (gas: 192549)\n[PASS] test_transferFromUnlimitedAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 172135)\n[PASS] test_transferMovesBalanceAndEmits() (gas: 82271)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsFromEmptyAccount() (gas: 33240)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsOnInsufficientBalance() (gas: 85088)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 30430)\n[PASS] test_transferToSelfKeepsBalance() (gas: 89688)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroAddressRevertsEvenForZeroValue() (gas: 30379)\n[PASS] test_transferWholeBalance() (gas: 64636)\n[PASS] test_transferZeroValueSucceedsAndEmits() (gas: 42124)\nSuite result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 16.75ms (78.10ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 tests for test/CryptoPunkin.invariant.t.sol:CryptoPunkinInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nCryptoPunkinInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariant_actorsHoldTheWholeSupply\n[PASS] invariant_balancesAndAllowancesMatchTheModel\n[PASS] invariant_tokenHoldsNoEther\n[PASS] invariant_totalSupplyNeverChanges\n CryptoPunkinInvariantTest invariants (runs: 256, calls: 16384, reverts: 0)\n\n╭----------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract       | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+============================================================+\n| PunkinsHandler | approve      | 5507  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| PunkinsHandler | transfer     | 5540  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| PunkinsHandler | transferFrom | 5337  | 0       | 0        |\n╰----------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\n[PASS] test_handlerExercisesEveryPath() (gas: 1910119)\nSuite result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 7.54s (7.54s CPU time)\n\nRan 4 test suites in 7.54s (7.58s CPU time): 52 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (52 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":57,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"CryptoPunkin.approve(address,uint256)\",\"CryptoPunkin.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"CryptoPunkin.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":6,\"README.md\":105,\"foundry.toml\":23,\"script/DeployCryptoPunkin.s.sol\":27,\"src/CryptoPunkin.sol\":124,\"src/interfaces/IERC20.sol\":39,\"test/CryptoPunkin.edges.t.sol\":134,\"test/CryptoPunkin.invariant.t.sol\":266,\"test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol\":404,\"test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol\":30,\"test/utils/TestBase.sol\":99},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"a666d56372bf1fc7a2769322b7449d22b9d368536c320f3b5e567686215a6a06","verifiedTreeHash":"2ed23389cfd638a731a78b99db8f9c2f33cb77c9","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+c78f45fe"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":634,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 6 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 563.52ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":118,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 2 tests for test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol:DeployCryptoPunkinTest\n[PASS] test_deployMintsSupplyToTheScriptContract() (gas: 1063802)\n[PASS] test_deployTwiceGivesTwoIndependentTokens() (gas: 1465766)\nSuite result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 498.72µs (492.46µs CPU time)\n\nRan 37 tests for test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol:CryptoPunkinTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_allowanceIsPerOwnerSpenderPair(address,address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 66388, ~: 66867)\n[PASS] testFuzz_approveThenTransferFrom(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 136350, ~: 137972)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferAboveBalanceReverts(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 89971, ~: 90342)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferConservesSupply(address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 97951, ~: 98405)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromAboveAllowanceReverts(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 95385, ~: 95712)\n[PASS] test_approveDoesNotRequireBalance() (gas: 57723)\n[PASS] test_approveOverwritesNotAccumulates() (gas: 120953)\n[PASS] test_approveRevertsForZeroSpender() (gas: 30302)\n[PASS] test_approveSetsAllowanceAndEmits() (gas: 71913)\n[PASS] test_constructorMintsWholeSupplyToDeployer() (gas: 17597)\n[PASS] test_deployerHasNoSpecialPowerOverHolders() (gas: 91437)\n[PASS] test_eachDeploymentHasItsOwnSupply() (gas: 21742)\n[PASS] test_interfaceConformance() (gas: 16918)\n[PASS] test_metadata() (gas: 17609)\n[PASS] test_noMintOrAdminSelectorIsAnswered() (gas: 766525)\n[PASS] test_rejectsPlainEtherAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 47965)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferFromRequiresAllowance() (gas: 85323)\n[PASS] test_supplyGoesToTheDeployingContractNotTheTestOrOrigin() (gas: 261114)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsOneBillionWithEighteenDecimals() (gas: 28907)\n[PASS] test_transferChainsBetweenHolders() (gas: 191594)\n[PASS] test_transferFromExactAllowanceLeavesZero() (gas: 172960)\n[PASS] test_transferFromOnlySpendsTheCallersOwnAllowance() (gas: 136603)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsAboveAllowance() (gas: 132371)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsAboveBalanceEvenWithAllowance() (gas: 142094)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsFromZeroAddress() (gas: 33637)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 85304)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWithoutAllowance() (gas: 85288)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSpendsAllowance() (gas: 192549)\n[PASS] test_transferFromUnlimitedAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 172135)\n[PASS] test_transferMovesBalanceAndEmits() (gas: 82271)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsFromEmptyAccount() (gas: 33240)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsOnInsufficientBalance() (gas: 85088)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 30430)\n[PASS] test_transferToSelfKeepsBalance() (gas: 89688)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroAddressRevertsEvenForZeroValue() (gas: 30379)\n[PASS] test_transferWholeBalance() (gas: 64636)\n[PASS] test_transferZeroValueSucceedsAndEmits() (gas: 42124)\nSuite result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 16.95ms (79.89ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 18.89ms (17.44ms CPU time): 39 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (39 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":54,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"CryptoPunkin.approve(address,uint256)\",\"CryptoPunkin.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"CryptoPunkin.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":6,\"README.md\":105,\"foundry.toml\":23,\"launch.json\":20,\"script/DeployCryptoPunkin.s.sol\":27,\"src/CryptoPunkin.sol\":124,\"src/interfaces/IERC20.sol\":39,\"test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol\":404,\"test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol\":30,\"test/utils/TestBase.sol\":99},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"edcb32a9e756df7188837a5be99042555e3a07119cd1546d43e2a7280ba214f0","verifiedTreeHash":"9175967602a1aa73f62b9607a7e16bd3839ad498","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+c78f45fe"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":676,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 6 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 592.81ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":177,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 2 tests for test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol:DeployCryptoPunkinTest\n[PASS] test_deployMintsSupplyToTheScriptContract() (gas: 1063802)\n[PASS] test_deployTwiceGivesTwoIndependentTokens() (gas: 1465766)\nSuite result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 528.30µs (493.56µs CPU time)\n\nRan 37 tests for test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol:CryptoPunkinTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_allowanceIsPerOwnerSpenderPair(address,address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 66388, ~: 66867)\n[PASS] testFuzz_approveThenTransferFrom(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 136350, ~: 137972)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferAboveBalanceReverts(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 89971, ~: 90342)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferConservesSupply(address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 97951, ~: 98405)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromAboveAllowanceReverts(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 95385, ~: 95712)\n[PASS] test_approveDoesNotRequireBalance() (gas: 57723)\n[PASS] test_approveOverwritesNotAccumulates() (gas: 120953)\n[PASS] test_approveRevertsForZeroSpender() (gas: 30302)\n[PASS] test_approveSetsAllowanceAndEmits() (gas: 71913)\n[PASS] test_constructorMintsWholeSupplyToDeployer() (gas: 17597)\n[PASS] test_deployerHasNoSpecialPowerOverHolders() (gas: 91437)\n[PASS] test_eachDeploymentHasItsOwnSupply() (gas: 21742)\n[PASS] test_interfaceConformance() (gas: 16918)\n[PASS] test_metadata() (gas: 17609)\n[PASS] test_noMintOrAdminSelectorIsAnswered() (gas: 766525)\n[PASS] test_rejectsPlainEtherAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 47965)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferFromRequiresAllowance() (gas: 85323)\n[PASS] test_supplyGoesToTheDeployingContractNotTheTestOrOrigin() (gas: 261114)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsOneBillionWithEighteenDecimals() (gas: 28907)\n[PASS] test_transferChainsBetweenHolders() (gas: 191594)\n[PASS] test_transferFromExactAllowanceLeavesZero() (gas: 172960)\n[PASS] test_transferFromOnlySpendsTheCallersOwnAllowance() (gas: 136603)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsAboveAllowance() (gas: 132371)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsAboveBalanceEvenWithAllowance() (gas: 142094)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsFromZeroAddress() (gas: 33637)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 85304)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWithoutAllowance() (gas: 85288)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSpendsAllowance() (gas: 192549)\n[PASS] test_transferFromUnlimitedAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 172135)\n[PASS] test_transferMovesBalanceAndEmits() (gas: 82271)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsFromEmptyAccount() (gas: 33240)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsOnInsufficientBalance() (gas: 85088)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 30430)\n[PASS] test_transferToSelfKeepsBalance() (gas: 89688)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroAddressRevertsEvenForZeroValue() (gas: 30379)\n[PASS] test_transferWholeBalance() (gas: 64636)\n[PASS] test_transferZeroValueSucceedsAndEmits() (gas: 42124)\nSuite result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 18.47ms (83.28ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 19.27ms (18.99ms CPU time): 39 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (39 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":62,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"CryptoPunkin.approve(address,uint256)\",\"CryptoPunkin.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"CryptoPunkin.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":6,\"README.md\":105,\"foundry.toml\":23,\"script/DeployCryptoPunkin.s.sol\":27,\"src/CryptoPunkin.sol\":124,\"src/interfaces/IERC20.sol\":39,\"test/CryptoPunkin.t.sol\":404,\"test/DeployCryptoPunkin.t.sol\":30,\"test/utils/TestBase.sol\":99},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":1181,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":481,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/CryptoPunkin.sol:39: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"f7a6c20621f0ecfc7af8b3ab3464b1f8fd92922f02dcd9f982dee2d0da9767ad","verifiedTreeHash":"e21817147e5250efe96c32af185cba032588c44c","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+c78f45fe"}]}