{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"4cf21b70-3622-4883-90ed-0ce79f62a561","kind":"skill:research-report","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"f6836e5a3615d3eb31cb27315f0e1696cf935fca141c68fe6419780dfc85ff04","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","tools":[]},"key":"research_report","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"**FINANCIER / FINCR — Urgent Robinhood-native agent payout settlement research**\n\nResearch and provide an implementable solution to the missing authenticated accepted-agent-to-wallet settlement interface for FINANCIER on Robinhood Chain 4663.\n\nPublic Solidity source:\nhttps://github.com/imd-financier/financier-open\n\nPinned commit:\n153f1ebeca4951013168609adcc6b0a17c32dc54\n\nStudy `FounderFundedMining.sol`, `RobinhoodJobController.sol`, `AttestedAgentRounds.sol` and the official IMD Intake interfaces.\n\nFINANCIER runs a Dutch auction denominated in IMD. Winning financiers sponsor official IMD jobs that benefit FINANCIER. Financiers earn 80% of mining FINCR; the remaining 20% must be shared equally among distinct agents with accepted qualifying work.\n\nOfficial Robinhood Intake successfully authenticates payment, request IDs, exact job bodies and completion callbacks. However, completion alone does not authenticate the COMPLETE accepted-agent list, payout-wallet ownership or final settlement. The existing immutable controller has no finalization entrypoint.\n\n**Priority 1 — Find an existing official solution.**\n\nInspect current IMD protocol contracts, official source, ABI, job records, accepted submissions, work receipts, result documents, Intake callbacks, oracle/registry interfaces and successful Robinhood jobs. Compare authentic token-launch reward snapshots only where relevant.\n\nDetermine whether an ordinary `job.open` provides an authenticated and COMPLETE accepted-work/agent/wallet manifest, or whether it can be derived from an existing officially authorized result or commitment.\n\nCite actual contract addresses, verified functions, transaction hashes, original records and documents. Do not assume that an API list, Merkle root, payout wallet, completion hash or successful job payment proves eligibility or completeness.\n\nPrioritize Robinhood-native evidence; do not introduce an Ethereum cross-chain dependency unless necessary and demonstrated.\n\n**Priority 2 — Design the smallest genuinely secure integration.**\n\nIf an official supported mechanism exists, specify exact calldata/ABI, payload or proof format, publisher authorization, canonical agent IDs, wallet mapping, finality, revocation, duplicate handling, request/body/job/period linkage and one-shot settlement. Show how FINANCIER should integrate it with `AttestedAgentRounds` before deployment.\n\nDistinct qualifying agents must receive equal shares under the approved identity/deduplication policy. All FINCR payouts must remain bounded by the existing 20% mining allocation. Financier claims must remain independent.\n\n**Priority 3 — If official completeness is unavailable, give us a workable decision.**\n\nIdentify precisely what IMD currently authenticates and the smallest MISSING authority, field or interface.\n\nPropose a minimal, explicit official acceptance-and-wallet attestation suitable for Robinhood 4663, including domain-separated signatures or verified on-chain commitments, final revision, complete membership, payout ownership and replay protection.\n\nExplain whether an existing IMD authority can issue it today, without inventing authorization.\n\nCompare realistic alternatives, including a strictly disclosed, bounded trust-based MVP fallback if cryptographic completeness is unavailable. Describe the omissions, false inclusions and Sybil risks of each. Do not claim that a founder-generated root constitutes official proof.\n\n**Mandatory deliverables in `artifacts/report.md`:**\n\n1. A clear **EXISTING SUPPORTED / REQUIRES IMD SUPPORT / BLOCKED** verdict.\n2. An evidence table linking at least five relevant primary sources, including successful genuine jobs.\n3. The exact missing interface, if any, and its responsible official authority.\n4. Minimal recommended predeployment contract changes, function signatures or pseudocode.\n5. A concrete end-to-end sequence from Robinhood `job.open` through official work acceptance to an agent's FINCR claim.\n6. Adversarial analysis of omitted agents, duplicate identities, malicious wallet substitution, stale results, replay and permanently quarantined funds.\n7. A prioritized implementation and validation checklist achievable for a hackathon MVP.\n8. Explicit separation of verified facts, assumptions, proposals and unresolved dependencies.\n\nThis is a focused technical research task, not a generic tokenomics audit or marketing report.\n\nDo not deploy, spend money, contact third parties, or edit production contracts. Do not claim a complete solution without verifiable supporting evidence.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"2a1180fed7ee87edc4459791466064e03e9d59e0ddd3a60d5ddaa5dac2d347f8","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"4cf21b70-3622-4883-90ed-0ce79f62a561","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52468","feedbackHash":"2a12922a3a4a488f5f0bb16db61a4f6642555eb8ea486f2cd863b7f316408a77","nodeKey":"research_report","submissionHash":"f6836e5a3615d3eb31cb27315f0e1696cf935fca141c68fe6419780dfc85ff04","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"7c8a19c077652a44fbaab3bec2743cb6adfc107fc830171b807fd96edcc33113","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":24446,"hash":"4db9bf9154d19b7deea42af193b7a5467ad59c944f633de0382595a0d941cc2b","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"c9743cd9807c4c3a","findings":[],"hash":"f6836e5a3615d3eb31cb27315f0e1696cf935fca141c68fe6419780dfc85ff04","nodeId":"70d6c664-352d-413a-9274-ace2946dc929","outcome":"completed","summary":"The report is written and untracked at `artifacts/report.md`, with a short `artifacts/README.md` describing the question and limits. No source files were changed and nothing was committed.\n\n**Verdict: REQUIRES IMD SUPPORT.** IMD does not authenticate a complete accepted-agent and payout-wallet manifest on Robinhood Chain 4663.\n\n**What the evidence shows**\n- On Robinhood, IMD authenticates only payment, request ID, body, and one completion callback from the Intake writer. The completion hash binds a result document, not an agent list or wallet.\n- Per-job work receipts and per-agent acceptance signals exist only on Ethereum mainnet. The real job `3d7ff049…` was recorded in tx `0x952500a5…` via `WorkRegistry.recordWork` with five ERC-8004 `NewFeedback` events. The docs state receipts are written on Ethereum only, and the Robinhood contract table lists no WorkRegistry or ERC-8004 registry.\n- Neither the work record nor the review documents contain any wallet, owner, signer, or signature field.\n- The oracle's EIP-712 attestation is the closest Robinhood-native signed shape. Its real use on 4663 is tx `0x5933a994…`. But the oracle only answers chain-evidence recipes, so it cannot attest an acceptance list today.\n- Launch reward snapshots use a different authority and leaf schema and do not apply to per-job agents.\n\n**What the report delivers**\n- Evidence table with ten primary sources, two of them genuine successful jobs.\n- The exact missing interface: an IMD-operator-signed, chain-4663-domain-separated Acceptance Manifest, with a proposed struct and typehash.\n- Minimal pre-deployment changes: split scope and settlement authority, add a signer-verified finalize path, keep payouts bounded by the existing 20% stream.\n- End-to-end sequence, adversarial table, and a prioritized MVP checklist.\n- A disclosed trust-based fallback using the existing `finalize` under a multisig, clearly labelled as not official proof.\n\n**Limits**\n- The Bash sandbox failed to start, so I used file and web tools only and ran no Foundry tests.\n- The Robinhood block explorer refused TLS, so one Robinhood transaction listed in the readiness script was not re-fetched.\n- The result document schema for a real FINANCIER job was not observed because no job was bought.\n\nNot delivered: artifacts/README.md. Under artifacts/, only this step's named outputs leave the machine.","treeHash":"81f60d429293871ebca68aa53c29a82344becf9c","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":878087,"inputTokens":322,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":20961,"runtime":"claude","turns":47,"wallClockMs":312906}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"f6836e5a3615d3eb31cb27315f0e1696cf935fca141c68fe6419780dfc85ff04","verifiedTreeHash":"81f60d429293871ebca68aa53c29a82344becf9c","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+a6ee6548"}]}