{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"47f44537-b572-4746-a9ce-29f415d4709d","kind":"skill:build-website","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"3ed6036b9d3969159b8253ec89952b782869fd3ef80c62fa577b3de669d7af07","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"mustProduce":["dist/index.html"],"network":true,"optionalTools":["browser"],"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"a60bc8b42446c13d993341179fe13c712a5addb118fc532fb2d15e71f912efc8","skillId":"build-website","tools":[]},"key":"build_website","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"a60bc8b42446c13d993341179fe13c712a5addb118fc532fb2d15e71f912efc8","skillId":"build-website","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"d6257d4eea6a8b3458b14c3fe4b16ede060084924241a12c171669328f7be8d7","dependsOn":["build_website"],"execution":{"network":true,"optionalTools":["browser"],"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"fd33b6741366d364a55a4c0ba2bc4f5d329cec0b62f27a83289dc5b30ab03575","skillId":"design-critic","tools":[]},"key":"design_critic","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"fd33b6741366d364a55a4c0ba2bc4f5d329cec0b62f27a83289dc5b30ab03575","skillId":"design-critic","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"The Hooks Store, job 7: launch safety. The owner's first real launches showed that a request the swarm cannot finish still spends the fee, so this job makes a post-payment question almost impossible and carries every open finding. (1) Fee wording: in src/blocks/catalog.json every fee sentence (Swap fee, Different buy and sell fees, Whale fee, Volatility fee, Buyback jar, Prize pot, Fee that fades, and any block that says the ETH side or settled in ETH) names the pair currency for both the fee side and the settlement: IMD for a type A launch paired with IMD, ETH otherwise; an IMD-paired request adds the sentence 'do not convert the fee to ETH and do not use any other pool'; 'my wallet' is written as the paying wallet's address; the treasury choice reads IMD's treasury and writes 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22 (SPEC 5.1, decisions 17 and 18); update the fixtures and add composer tests for every block under every type and pairing. (2) A consistency check runs on every composed request before the free check and before Launch, and locks Launch with a red notice naming the sentence when a fee side or settlement does not match the pair currency, a recipient is not an address, a block depends on a pool, token or service with no address on the deploy chain, or two rules contradict each other; unit-test it on the composed output of every block under every type and pairing. (3) Fixed facts: when the free check's response carries a fixed fact that conflicts with the request (such as the IMD-side fee being sold for ETH while the request keeps the fee in IMD), the What the swarm understood panel shows the conflict and Launch stays locked until the request opts out explicitly; the composer adds the opt-out for IMD pairs by itself. (4) Hook page: a job IMD reports as blocked shows the builder's question as IMD reports it under Needs attention, read through the relay from GET /jobs/:id (blockedReason and the failed node's failureReason), with a button Fix in Builder that reopens the draft that produced the request with the question beside it; the launch's request is kept so the relaunch is a corrected request. (5) Known questions: src/blocks/known-questions.json lists past builder questions as rules the check applies; the first entry is launch 2's question, which asked for an IMD/ETH conversion pool because the fee sentence said ETH while the pool was paired with IMD. (6) Copy: the fee table and the Launch page say that a request the swarm has to stop on still spends the fee and that these checks exist to make that rare (SPEC 6.3 and 6.7). Carry-overs from jobs 5 and 6: remove the hat drawn over Pepe's head in src/scene/pond.ts (drawHat) and keep the far boat and the birds (SPEC 9, decision 16); a confirmed cancelled or replaced launch transaction in web/src/LaunchReview.tsx fails with a working retry instead of staying pending with the flow locked; when a reorg removes a request, the pond ticker in web/src/Landing.tsx drops its announcement and stops showing its age; reproductions are in https://raw.githubusercontent.com/the-hook-store/hooks-store-spec/main/evidence/job-6-reviews.md. Refresh SPEC.md from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/the-hook-store/hooks-store-spec/main/SPEC.md (now 1.25). Everything else from job 6 stays as delivered. Deliver source, dist/ and test results under tests/results/job7: unit, relay, Playwright at 320, 390 and 1440 for every route, and the live-RPC settle test.","parentJobId":"c2b72f7e-31f3-42e2-84b4-730165ce5310","planHash":"c1d668b5f2090b7f8afb8c9d80f9c97671bdd751b49d87cda4c77542002d71d4","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"4cc83fbc-42d7-49fe-a9db-4310fb61a570","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-2369-build-hooks-store-phase"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51249","feedbackHash":"6060b9a4d31ba2951c7b9a7ddbf02a1e7ed07c6d828d89a3d7452bcb8535a3d9","nodeKey":"build_website","submissionHash":"dc668e4445897dcde24819537a5e04f5bec9e213c22956b44cf5dbe06255515a","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51521","feedbackHash":"344ed3388336839e030c622a77fd86babcc3e6539787da6349aa398c0ce56f61","nodeKey":"build_website","submissionHash":"3ed6036b9d3969159b8253ec89952b782869fd3ef80c62fa577b3de669d7af07","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51543","feedbackHash":"4912e03e8197b61d529c0df56a9a9aa983f025973e4a684053c0893d6f6e7f62","nodeKey":"design_critic","submissionHash":"04ffd2dc80b1a0ba56f02cd7c66acd225865c5a671425d4745260163640a4b52","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51138","feedbackHash":"403269c391a6c151f2b9295fa6c8aa4c5d501a6b05dd8cf3d47e6b5523d6f728","nodeKey":"design_critic","submissionHash":"d6257d4eea6a8b3458b14c3fe4b16ede060084924241a12c171669328f7be8d7","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"61325c90b9c9081c6e920b74a3f0b6504393b64475a3d196b65e508c1ab97c9e","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"d67cd7a060b21c9f","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: the liquidity-lock conflict check recognizes only Pause switch and Circuit breaker. Liquidity lock plus Trading hours composes both 'removing it earlier reverts' and 'Liquidity changes are always allowed' without a finding. Max buy per wallet plus Max swap size similarly promises unrestricted sells while rejecting large sells.\nChange to: check the conflicting effects of these built-in block pairs, quote both sentences in the red notice, and block the free check and Launch until one rule is removed or an explicit compatible exception is composed. Add pairwise composer regressions, including lp-lock + hours and max-buy + max-swap.\nWhy: job 7 explicitly requires the consistency check to lock Launch when two rules contradict each other; these are ordinary catalog combinations that need no custom prose.","line":74,"path":"src/lib/safety.ts","reproduction":"390x844 Chromium, production dist at /preview/#builder: choose type A, Stack blocks, Ethereum, IMD, 50% pool, remainder 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22; add Liquidity lock (7 days) and Trading hours (09:00-17:00). Exact request contains 'Liquidity added to the pool is locked for 7 days ... removing it earlier reverts' and 'Liquidity changes are always allowed.' Measured: 0 .safety-notice elements, 0 alerts, Check with the swarm enabled, Continue to launch enabled. Pure-function reproduction: d=newDraft(); d.settings={...d.settings,chain:1,pool:50,rem:'0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22'}; d.blocks=[entry('token'),entry('lp-lock'),entry('hours')]; checkConsistency(body(d)) returns []; validate(d) returns []. Expected: a contradiction finding naming both sentences and disabled continuation.","severity":"high","snippet":"  conflict(findRule(/Liquidity added to the pool is locked/), findRule(/Liquidity can always be removed while paused|Liquidity can still be removed during the pause/), 'A liquidity lock conflicts with the pause rule’s promise that liquidity can still be removed. Remove one rule or make the exception explicit.');","title":"bug: conflicting catalog rules pass the launch consistency gate"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: settlement detection recognizes 'settled in' and 'paid out in' but misses the ordinary 'paid in' wording. A Custom rule saying 'Every swap fee must be paid in ETH.' is accepted in an IMD-paired request whose footer keeps fees in IMD.\nChange to: detect 'paid in' and equivalent explicit fee-payment currency assertions, report the offending sentence, and lock Check and Launch when that currency differs from the pair. Add composed custom-rule regressions for both pairing directions.\nWhy: job 7 requires the pre-check and pre-Launch guard to reject any fee settlement that does not match the pair currency; selecting Custom rule is a supported path.","line":27,"path":"src/lib/safety.ts","reproduction":"390x844 Chromium, production dist: in Builder choose type A, IMD, Ethereum and pool 50%; set remainder to 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22, add Custom rule, and enter exactly 'Every swap fee must be paid in ETH.' Inspect Exact request. It contains both that numbered rule and 'Keep every hook fee in IMD: do not convert the fee to ETH and do not use any other pool.' Measured: no safety notice, Check and Continue to launch enabled. Pure-function check: create the same draft with blocks [entry('token'),{id:'custom',p:{text:'Every swap fee must be paid in ETH.'}}]; checkConsistency(body(d)) returns []. Expected: fee-settlement finding naming the ETH sentence and disabled continuation. The production launchBody(d, config, account) serializer also accepts this exact draft; no transaction was signed or sent.","severity":"high","snippet":"      const settlement = [...asserted.matchAll(/(?:settl\\w*|paid out|payout|pay(?:ment)?|collect\\w*) (?:(?:the (?:fee|pot)|it|them) )?(?:in|as) (ETH|IMD)\\b/gi)].map(m => m[1].toUpperCase());","title":"bug: an ETH payout sentence bypasses the IMD settlement guard"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: the dependency check treats any full address anywhere in a sentence as sufficient for every service named there. A Custom rule can require Chainlink VRF without a coordinator, subscription or verified deploy-chain service address merely by including an unrelated winner-payment address. The checker also misses named pools such as 'Use the USDC/ETH pool for pricing.' entirely.\nChange to: associate each dependency with its own explicit deploy-chain address and refuse unresolved service/pool dependencies; a recipient address must not satisfy a service-address requirement. Add composed regressions with a named service and an unrelated recipient in the same sentence.\nWhy: job 7 requires the check to lock Launch for a block depending on a pool, token or service with no address on the deploy chain.","line":64,"path":"src/lib/safety.ts","reproduction":"390x844 Chromium, production dist /preview/#builder: type A, IMD, Ethereum, pool 50%, remainder 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22. Add Custom rule with exactly 'Use Chainlink VRF to draw the pot and pay the winner at 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22.' No Chainlink service address is supplied; the only address is expressly the payee. Actual: 0 safety notices, Check enabled, Continue to launch enabled; checkConsistency(body(d)) returns []. Control: removing 'and pay the winner at 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22' produces a dependency finding. Expected: both forms remain blocked until the specific VRF deployment/configuration is supplied or the dependency removed. The production launchBody(d, config, account) serializer also accepts this exact draft; no transaction was signed or sent.","severity":"high","snippet":"    if (external && !prohibition && !new RegExp(addressPattern).test(sentence)) add('dependency', sentence, 'Name the pool, token or service address on the deploy chain, or remove that dependency.');","title":"bug: a payout address is accepted as the missing service address"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: recipient validation checks a short list of literal phrases, including 'send the fee to', but skips 'Send swap fees to Bob.' A supported Custom rule can therefore name an unresolved fee recipient while every local safety gate remains clear.\nChange to: recognize fee-recipient clauses independently of singular/plural and intervening fee labels, require a concrete nonzero address, and quote the unresolved clause in the red notice. Add composed regressions for 'send swap fees to', 'fees go to', and the valid addressed equivalents.\nWhy: job 7 explicitly requires Launch to be locked when a recipient is not an address; the fee recipient cannot be guessed after payment.","line":34,"path":"src/lib/safety.ts","reproduction":"390x844 Chromium, production dist /preview/#builder: type A, IMD, Ethereum, pool 50%, explicit remainder 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22. Add Custom rule and enter exactly 'Send swap fees to Bob.' Actual: numbered request includes that sentence; there is no address for Bob, no red safety notice, and both Check and Continue to launch are enabled. checkConsistency(body(d)) returns []; changing only the sentence to 'Send the fee to Bob.' produces the expected recipient finding. Expected: both sentences lock continuation until Bob is replaced by a full address. The production launchBody(d, config, account) serializer also accepts this exact draft; no transaction was signed or sent.","severity":"high","snippet":"    for (const match of sentence.matchAll(/(?:send (?:it|them|the (?:bought |remaining )?tokens|the (?:fee|pot)) to|remainder goes to|\\d+(?:\\.\\d+)?% to)\\s+([^;,.]+(?:\\.[^\\s]+)?)/gi)) {","title":"bug: a named fee recipient passes without an address"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: fixedFactConflicts handles a few fee, supply and owner phrases but never compares the fixed token_split fact with the composed allocation or remainder recipient. A response saying 50% goes to the pool is displayed beside a request allocating 65%, with 'No blockers reported for this exact request' and no conflict gate.\nChange to: compare fixed token_split allocation and recipient against the exact composed request/body, surface both conflicting values, and lock Launch until the request contains an explicit matching opt-out and is checked again. Add a browser/unit regression using the existing recorded token_split fact against a different pool share.\nWhy: job 7 requires any conflicting fixed fact returned by the free check to be shown and to keep Launch locked until explicit opt-out, not only the IMD fee example.","line":107,"path":"src/lib/safety.ts","reproduction":"390x844 Chromium, production dist /preview/#builder: type A, Ethereum, ETH, Describe 'Observe swaps.', pool 65%, remainder 0x3f252e859a277a86A3967c11D4E054B2f07a1F22. Intercept only POST relay /check and return {facts:[the token_split fact from evidence/check-A-default-blocks.response.json],plan:[],blockers:[],suggestions:[]}. Its unchanged label is 'Split: 10% to the swarm, the other 90% is yours: 50% into the pool, the rest to your wallet'. Click Check with the swarm. Actual: panel shows that fixed 50% fact, Exact request says 'Pool: 65% of my 90% share seeds the pool', 0 alerts, Continue to launch enabled. fixedFactConflicts(body(d), facts) returns []. Expected: a fixed-fact conflict and locked continuation until explicit opt-out. This is a deterministic response fixture; no payment or real signature is involved.","severity":"high","snippet":"    const supply = /Supply: ([\\d,]+) with (\\d+) decimals/i.exec(claim), requested = /supply ([\\d,]+), (\\d+) decimals/i.exec(text);\n    if (supply && requested && (supply[1] !== requested[1] || supply[2] !== requested[2]) && input.customToken !== true) conflicts.push({ code: `fixed:${fact.id}`, sentence: fact.label, message: 'The requested supply or decimals conflict with the fixed token supply. Explicitly choose a custom token.' });\n    if (/no owner (?:functions|powers)/i.test(claim) && /^Owner .+ may only:/m.test(text)) conflicts.push({ code: `fixed:${fact.id}`, sentence: fact.label, message: `This fixed fact forbids the requested owner powers. Remove them or add “Opt out of fixed fact ${fact.id}.” to the request, then check again.` });","title":"bug: conflicting fixed pool allocation does not lock the checked request"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: the no-fees check ignores whether a fee rule applies to buys or sells and can compare a complete description against itself. The Builder's own Buy back and burn example charges sells and exempts buys, but the red notice labels this a contradiction and disables the free check and continuation.\nChange to: split description clauses and preserve buy/sell scope when comparing fee rules; do not classify 'No fees on buys' as forbidding a sell-only fee. Keep the supplied example and add it as a passing composer/safety regression, alongside a genuinely contradictory same-direction case.\nWhy: the existing Describe examples must remain usable, and a valid sell-only fee must not be blocked by the new consistency check.","line":79,"path":"src/lib/safety.ts","reproduction":"390x844 Chromium, production dist /preview/#builder: select Describe it, select the supplied 'Buy back and burn' example, choose Ethereum and pool 50% (with an explicit valid remainder address). The exact example is 'Take 1% of every sell and buy my token back with it, then burn what was bought. No fees on buys.' Actual: one red safety notice says 'The request both forbids fees and charges a fee. Remove one rule.' It quotes the same entire description on both sides of 'Conflicts with'; Check and Continue to launch are disabled. checkConsistency(body(d)) returns a contradiction for that prompt. Expected: no fee contradiction, since sells have a 1% fee and buys have none.","severity":"medium","snippet":"  conflict(userRules.find(s => /\\b(?:(?:no|without(?: charging| taking| collecting)?(?: any)?) (?:hook |swap |buy |sell )?fees?|(?:never|do not) (?:take|charge|collect) (?:a |any )?fees?)\\b/i.test(s)), userRules.find(s => /(?:Take|Collect) [\\d.]+%|pays an extra [\\d.]+%|hook fee .* is [\\d.]+%/i.test(s)), 'The request both forbids fees and charges a fee. Remove one rule.');","title":"bug: the Buy back and burn example is rejected as contradicting itself"}],"hash":"04ffd2dc80b1a0ba56f02cd7c66acd225865c5a671425d4745260163640a4b52","nodeId":"f046c149-a88a-4413-beb5-2bb49d912f9b","outcome":"completed","summary":"| Area | Result |\n|---|---|\n| Requirements | 22 met; 6 missing; 0 faked |\n| Broken features | 6 bugs: 5 high, 1 medium |\n| First screen, 390px | Product and main action visible |\n| taste@1 | 13/16 passed |\n| Copy | 0 findings |\n| Share card | Present; image returns HTTP 200 |\n\nRevision needed. Six verified findings, with exact fixes, inputs and source citations, are recorded in [.imd-findings.json](/home/imd9/.identitymd/work/47f44537-b572-4746-a9ce-29f415d4709d/f046c149-a88a-4413-beb5-2bb49d912f9b/.imd-findings.json):\n\n1. **High — bug:** conflicting catalog rules pass the consistency gate.\n2. **High — bug:** “paid in ETH” bypasses the IMD settlement guard.\n3. **High — bug:** a payee address satisfies a missing service-address check.\n4. **High — bug:** “Send swap fees to Bob” passes without an address.\n5. **High — bug:** a conflicting fixed pool allocation leaves continuation unlocked.\n6. **Medium — bug:** the supplied Buy back and burn example is rejected as contradicting itself.\n\n| Explicit requirement | Status | Evidence |\n|---|---|---|\n| Pair currency in Swap fee, Different buy/sell fees, Whale fee, Volatility fee, Buyback jar, Prize pot, Fee that fades and other fee clauses | Met | `catalog.json`, `compose.ts` |\n| IMD conversion and other-pool opt-out | Met | `IMD_FEE_OPT_OUT`, composer |\n| “My wallet” becomes the paying address | Met | `context()` |\n| IMD’s treasury label and exact supplied address | Met | Catalog options, `IMD_TREASURY` |\n| Updated composer fixtures | Met | `tests/fixtures/compose-{A,B,C}.txt` |\n| Composer tests for every block, type and pairing | Met | `tests/safety.test.mjs` |\n| Consistency check before free check and Launch | Met | `useSwarmCheck.ts`, `chain/launch.ts` |\n| Red notice names offending sentences | Met | `SafetyNotice.tsx`; recognized failures |\n| Reject mismatched fee side or settlement | Missing | Finding 2 |\n| Reject recipients without addresses | Missing | Finding 4 |\n| Reject dependencies without deploy-chain addresses | Missing | Finding 3 |\n| Reject contradictory rules | Missing | Finding 1 |\n| Unit-test consistency on every composed block/type/pairing | Met | 420-case matrix |\n| Show conflicting fixed facts and lock until explicit opt-out | Missing | Finding 5 |\n| Blocked question under Needs attention, through relay GET `/jobs/:id`, using both reason fields | Met | `RelayTimeline.tsx`, `relay.ts`; live blocked launch |\n| Fix in Builder restores draft with question beside it | Met | `Hook.tsx`, `draft.ts`, `Builder.tsx` |\n| Preserve original request for corrected relaunch | Met | Submitted-draft archive and previous-request disclosure |\n| Known questions become checker rules | Met | `known-questions.json`, `safety.ts` |\n| First known question records launch 2’s conversion-pool problem | Met | First JSON entry |\n| Fee table and Launch page explain stopped requests spend the fee and checks make that rare | Met | `LaunchReview.tsx` |\n| Remove hat; retain far boat and birds | Met | `src/scene/pond.ts` |\n| Confirmed cancelled Launch fails with working retry | Met | Cancellation browser test |\n| Confirmed replaced Launch fails with working retry | Met | Replacement browser test |\n| Reorg removes ticker announcement and age | Met | `Landing.tsx`; reorg browser test |\n| SPEC refreshed to 1.25 | Met | `SPEC.md:3` |\n| Preserve remaining job-6 behavior | Missing | Finding 6 introduces an example regression |\n| Deliver source and `dist/` | Met | Both present; export exercised |\n| Job-7 unit, relay, all-route width and live-RPC results | Met | `tests/results/job7/` |\n\nThe visual idea remains coherent: a Uniswap v4 hook storefront carried by a monochrome fishing pond and pixel interface. The three remaining probe flags follow that specified style.\n\nIndependent checks passed: 495 unit tests, nine relay tests, 39 job-7 Chromium tests, and all 21 route-width layouts. Live RPC reads settled in 1.7 seconds. WebKit could not launch. No real transaction was sent; implementation files remain unchanged","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":5591552,"inputTokens":174908,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","outputTokens":28934,"runtime":"codex","turns":8,"wallClockMs":708498}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"02371d79654fb3ed22b1f83f9e9417b94699aa8319d8cf9144d1f58bdf322594","device":"e698c63d215db960","findings":[],"hash":"3ed6036b9d3969159b8253ec89952b782869fd3ef80c62fa577b3de669d7af07","nodeId":"16a608c9-2753-4b14-8600-7ac832fe4adb","outcome":"completed","summary":"Fixed all six findings, rebuilt `dist/`, and wrote `.imd-responses.json`.\n\nValidation passed: 643 unit tests, 9 relay tests and 188 browser cases; seven optional cases skipped. Live RPC settled in 8.9 seconds. Bundle remains below 8 MiB.\n\n[Results and limitations](tests/results/job7/REVISION.md).","treeHash":"fbda6005481a00b8967b4cde73c01de35bae0967","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":8823680,"inputTokens":135384,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","outputTokens":57791,"runtime":"codex","turns":10,"wallClockMs":1234165}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"eb9b9b2a07ba481b","findings":[],"hash":"d6257d4eea6a8b3458b14c3fe4b16ede060084924241a12c171669328f7be8d7","nodeId":"f046c149-a88a-4413-beb5-2bb49d912f9b","outcome":"completed","summary":"| Area | Result |\n|---|---|\n| Requirements | 30 met; 0 missing; 0 faked |\n| Broken features | 0; all six previous findings resolved |\n| First screen, 390px | Product and main action visible |\n| taste@1 | 13/16; three required pixel-style exceptions |\n| Copy | 0 findings |\n| Share card | Present |\n\nSaved [`.imd-findings.json`](/root/.identitymd/work/47f44537-b572-4746-a9ce-29f415d4709d/f046c149-a88a-4413-beb5-2bb49d912f9b/.imd-findings.json) as `{\"findings\":[]}`. Source and export remain unchanged.\n\nEach previous finding is fixed:\n\n| Previous finding | Verified result |\n|---|---|\n| Conflicting catalog rules | Both reported pairs quote their conflicts and lock Check and Launch; removing either rule restores continuation. |\n| “Paid in ETH” bypass | Rejected for IMD pairing; matching currency passes. |\n| Payout address satisfying a service dependency | VRF with an unrelated payee and the unaddressed pricing pool remain blocked. |\n| Named fee recipient | “Send swap fees to Bob” and “fees go to Bob” are rejected; addressed equivalents pass. |\n| Fixed token allocation conflict | Recorded 50% fact conflicts with 65%, survives reload, and requires explicit opt-out plus recheck. |\n| Buy back and burn example | Passes with sell-only fees; same-direction contradictions remain blocked. |\n\nRequirement coverage:\n\n| Requirement | Status and evidence |\n|---|---|\n| Named fee blocks use pair currency for side and settlement | Met — `src/blocks/catalog.json`; composed matrix |\n| Other ETH-side/settlement sentences follow pairing | Met — catalog templates and composer |\n| IMD request forbids conversion and other pools | Met — `compose.ts`, `IMD_FEE_OPT_OUT` |\n| “My wallet” becomes the paying address | Met — composer and wallet browser case |\n| “IMD’s treasury” writes the supplied address | Met — `IMD_TREASURY`; recipient tests |\n| Update fixtures | Met — composer fixture comparisons |\n| Composer tests cover every block/type/pairing | Met — `compose.test.mjs`, `safety.test.mjs` |\n| Check consistency before free check | Met — `useSwarmCheck.ts`, `relay.ts` |\n| Check consistency before Launch | Met — launch serializer and signing guard |\n| Wrong fee side produces quoted red lock | Met — `SafetyNotice`; browser cases |\n| Wrong settlement produces quoted red lock | Met — settlement regressions |\n| Unresolved recipients lock continuation | Met — recipient regressions |\n| Unaddressed dependencies lock continuation | Met — service/pool tests and disabled Yield |\n| Contradictory rules lock continuation | Met — pairwise regressions and recovery |\n| Safety tests inspect every composed block/type/pairing | Met — 420-case block matrix |\n| Conflicting fixed facts appear in understood panel | Met — `SwarmPanel.tsx`; allocation regression |\n| Conflict remains locked until explicit opt-out/recheck | Met — navigation, stale-result and reload cases |\n| Composer supplies IMD opt-out automatically | Met — composer matrix |\n| Blocked question appears under Needs attention | Met — blocked Hook browser cases |\n| Relay reads both reported question fields | Met — `RelayTimeline.tsx`, `jobAttention()` |\n| Fix in Builder restores draft/question and preserves request | Met — saved and reconstructed draft cases |\n| Known questions apply launch 2’s conversion rule | Met — `known-questions.json`; rule tests |\n| Fee table explains stopped requests spend the fee | Met — `LaunchReview.tsx` fee table |\n| Launch page explains purpose of checks | Met — Check before paying panel |\n| Remove hat; retain distant boat and birds | Met — `pond.ts`; scene regressions |\n| Cancelled/replaced launch has working retry | Met — receipt replacement browser cases |\n| Reorg removes ticker announcement and age | Met — reorg regression, including another minute |\n| Refresh SPEC to 1.25 | Met — `SPEC.md` |\n| Preserve job 6 behavior | Met — full regression suite |\n| Deliver source, dist and requested test results | Met — `dist/`, `tests/results/job7/`; all routes at three widths |\n\nIndependent checks pass","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":7600768,"inputTokens":175805,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","outputTokens":28431,"runtime":"codex","turns":11,"wallClockMs":739694}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"e3abd3bc1cf113e0fc6730a85306337b28d1cba8ddf0dc1075c3943169eaa0d8","device":"dede2fc25efa8cdd","findings":[],"hash":"dc668e4445897dcde24819537a5e04f5bec9e213c22956b44cf5dbe06255515a","nodeId":"16a608c9-2753-4b14-8600-7ac832fe4adb","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented job 7 and all carry-over fixes. Source, `dist/`, SPEC 1.25, documentation and test results are complete.\n\nPassed: build/typecheck, 495 unit tests, nine relay tests, 160 browser tests, and both live checks. Seven optional browser cases skipped. Bundle: 6.08 MB; protected files unchanged.\n\n[Results and limitations](tests/results/job7/REVIEW.md).","treeHash":"baa67b1ae3d79b8ccab6a9bd9cf8b12e42593e37","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":17191296,"inputTokens":595007,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","outputTokens":118103,"runtime":"codex","turns":11,"wallClockMs":2832205}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"3ed6036b9d3969159b8253ec89952b782869fd3ef80c62fa577b3de669d7af07","verifiedTreeHash":"fbda6005481a00b8967b4cde73c01de35bae0967","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+560ab6a2"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"dc668e4445897dcde24819537a5e04f5bec9e213c22956b44cf5dbe06255515a","verifiedTreeHash":"baa67b1ae3d79b8ccab6a9bd9cf8b12e42593e37","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+560ab6a2"}]}