{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"08edf14a-e121-4154-b4cf-5d63970ae27b","kind":"goal","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1236dae5913b9e3420643da40eb6c04705709729508e5ba6cec50963af8ee961","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.7"],"skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b01_0001","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"bd000ffb1f5ab7214399f8da1d0582d036a25ecd35ef04e45d674a83169bf426","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b02_0001","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"d99db77c114d252c01bb2e649087229e743c333a285cb800ed8cd2c7fc52362d","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.7"],"skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b03_0001","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"732b06dbafa646627d2ee7c135f4573482108ea06c979e8423e233d122bae926","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.7"],"skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b03_0002","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"821a46d3e033645a83da2556236ce082e4511766db2a52bfab8bb5ea465fabfa","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.7"],"skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b03_0003","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"bcfefec3b3a8bfc7cd3b94cf3468623d2639810f0d72fda23e632ba2d3a7478e","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.7"],"skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b04_0001","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"443b505e6dca2b6b671510d995cb80fb2af69e1ea53a913fd87ea0503c651dfb","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.7"],"skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_b04_0002","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0089d31feca5b0164a857332f827ca9ad9b157db73b1d0d70bfd7c459636ec95","skillId":"goal-code","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"503ff28f3658d778b148765c301c05c0bc505944826a40b67d5c2530fc1cd58a","dependsOn":["writeup"],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"45f9acaa5c3f0278dbc1041a9c17f94ef6772ce0a54ab0ce223db93e95402f45","skillId":"goal-judge","tools":[]},"key":"judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"45f9acaa5c3f0278dbc1041a9c17f94ef6772ce0a54ab0ce223db93e95402f45","skillId":"goal-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"f0db74fedd098ea987bad29fbf705dc57b834368f1f47cf6eef784750e610917","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":["worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","tools":[]},"key":"orchestrate_001","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"bccc8900307cdab8723a10f6614336c37c412363dd08c631ca9520ebbfd0c05a","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":["worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","tools":[]},"key":"orchestrate_002","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"fbaa5361282e5c67aa4cd40b24f39e0749cdc060d81a58d5304e8e482801c230","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":["worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","tools":[]},"key":"orchestrate_003","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"dcaa83af88139e9db34826807602a1f56184d05157e6ee1d279d0dbe0223a022","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":["worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","tools":[]},"key":"orchestrate_004","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"18508a7b680fe3f7ed4befd010ea9e31f89525e3907b65d4d00929fc8d766c54","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":["worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","tools":[]},"key":"orchestrate_005","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"47342ead015d6c938b6d816ae5f3413a5e8d119028581a9b8216499160e8b3d8","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":["worker:0.1.6"],"skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","tools":[]},"key":"writeup","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"214ab89ecce7850ab2a1d2231a833efd2bc8f9ad8b77902a15c8391d95b7722e","skillId":"goal-orchestrator","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Build rollup-risk, a small open-source TypeScript library and command-line tool that scores how trust-minimized an Ethereum rollup is from L2BEAT-style facts. The input is a JSON file listing rollups, each with: its L2BEAT stage (0, 1 or 2), its proof system (fraud proofs, validity proofs, or none live), whether proving is permissionless, its exit window in days, who can upgrade it (a security council with its threshold, a multisig, or one key), where it posts data (Ethereum blobs, calldata, or an outside data-availability layer), and whether users can force a transaction in if the sequencer censors them. The library validates that input, gives a clear error for each bad field, scores each rollup from 0 to 100 with a breakdown of points per factor and the reason for each, and ranks them. The tool reads the JSON file and prints a ranked table, or JSON with a flag. Requirements: no dependencies at all; TypeScript run directly by Node 24's built-in type stripping, with no build step; tests with node:test covering the validator, every scoring factor, the ranking and the tool's output, all passing; a README with the scoring method, an example input with six well-known rollups, and the example's output; an MIT license. Plan the repository's layout first so later work fits it, then build the parts in parallel where they do not touch the same files.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"96fdc9b7cf913550a9d5463faee6e37801dde7449ecce46035e54a1113d39bf6","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"08edf14a-e121-4154-b4cf-5d63970ae27b","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51725","feedbackHash":"c73515b723a98ffa835a4703efeb5ce612a69252a208c962db1b94ad0bff4713","nodeKey":"item_b01_0001","submissionHash":"1236dae5913b9e3420643da40eb6c04705709729508e5ba6cec50963af8ee961","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52167","feedbackHash":"2b0f23ce910da686ae60e8581a6d6b2d3497184d3142ed5a0f5e831b0dbca7c9","nodeKey":"item_b02_0001","submissionHash":"bd000ffb1f5ab7214399f8da1d0582d036a25ecd35ef04e45d674a83169bf426","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52136","feedbackHash":"e36d7d08707fb43fc1696dbd81b9dd3118ccb70f8c5a5f426e0d67733e2281a6","nodeKey":"item_b03_0001","submissionHash":"d99db77c114d252c01bb2e649087229e743c333a285cb800ed8cd2c7fc52362d","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52463","feedbackHash":"f6cb31f76daee76a1ba066fa87fb2a9e0adbd7610d016498559b05d2b04723b0","nodeKey":"item_b03_0002","submissionHash":"732b06dbafa646627d2ee7c135f4573482108ea06c979e8423e233d122bae926","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51548","feedbackHash":"2e2a079e5044a16280dc97d66ae69a76c6b19810ad1d5b9d6bb1c041469ba0dc","nodeKey":"item_b03_0003","submissionHash":"821a46d3e033645a83da2556236ce082e4511766db2a52bfab8bb5ea465fabfa","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"53938","feedbackHash":"0e2a80a778cbc1a96ee32eb9d0a71694886586043a9a99e8a3752652c4f7c894","nodeKey":"item_b04_0001","submissionHash":"bcfefec3b3a8bfc7cd3b94cf3468623d2639810f0d72fda23e632ba2d3a7478e","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50957","feedbackHash":"aea9c8d4f71e01a5a65a9c0ab4039ee752c79a5287d8878c1e9583443a1d797e","nodeKey":"item_b04_0002","submissionHash":"443b505e6dca2b6b671510d995cb80fb2af69e1ea53a913fd87ea0503c651dfb","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"55450","feedbackHash":"59e9a352516cb861732cc856191dc5372c34ff63abfe656bea9f84fbc30db0a0","nodeKey":"judge","submissionHash":"503ff28f3658d778b148765c301c05c0bc505944826a40b67d5c2530fc1cd58a","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50971","feedbackHash":"f6278fc35b38d270de8f6fdb023af96196f1e22ee0838ea5b84142574db1c82f","nodeKey":"orchestrate_001","submissionHash":"f0db74fedd098ea987bad29fbf705dc57b834368f1f47cf6eef784750e610917","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50959","feedbackHash":"fcf99ceb3fa442ca668ec9618518cb554b816adad2f2efdc3987277f0f552475","nodeKey":"orchestrate_002","submissionHash":"bccc8900307cdab8723a10f6614336c37c412363dd08c631ca9520ebbfd0c05a","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50974","feedbackHash":"3b54d71bdd4edbfc4f387fc194e61ec9273d6da57f5ae97b3188a5b9087cc90a","nodeKey":"orchestrate_002","submissionHash":"2d22d29ad2cd4255c665c4516c086cc5404f4a20d464d7bb69ee66ad96f2915d","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":0},{"agentId":"50962","feedbackHash":"7e39c6dda9830a1e499242d3ed59b0b1ac3f88b43995fd815b7024754b8e8b03","nodeKey":"orchestrate_003","submissionHash":"fbaa5361282e5c67aa4cd40b24f39e0749cdc060d81a58d5304e8e482801c230","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50971","feedbackHash":"b172e7f920d507909c6a07a9b93da5b538084a38cde5f02d636de70e63334b21","nodeKey":"orchestrate_004","submissionHash":"dcaa83af88139e9db34826807602a1f56184d05157e6ee1d279d0dbe0223a022","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50974","feedbackHash":"e7ab4c631f4cc24023951b1025e6d2bec8f76825b9835d5e90595f8a9caab10e","nodeKey":"orchestrate_005","submissionHash":"18508a7b680fe3f7ed4befd010ea9e31f89525e3907b65d4d00929fc8d766c54","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50959","feedbackHash":"0fab7aae160157efc4662db7544df556decc875108d4cce323a85abc073225b7","nodeKey":"writeup","submissionHash":"47342ead015d6c938b6d816ae5f3413a5e8d119028581a9b8216499160e8b3d8","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"e998288ec73428efd55db09357d4189801ba68d9098655e389cfbbe0f88b7ce8","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4432,"hash":"c1c5b4d92859e264d04cf6e32d6b47fc74d781504a706ae1c32510d18e302a75","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/repository-foundation/items/layout-contracts/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"047915fdec42c87dde3744dfca1c60df18385d15bcf6e13104700b633ba8cce8","device":"004eae350f695d24","findings":[],"hash":"1236dae5913b9e3420643da40eb6c04705709729508e5ba6cec50963af8ee961","nodeId":"65e6645e-2f0a-4bc3-bea0-028333b85157","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created package configuration, MIT license, public types and architecture documentation with frozen APIs, rubric and parallel file scopes.\n\nChecks passed on Node v24.21.0: package assertions, direct `.ts` execution, type-only imports and whitespace checks. Runtime modules remain for later workers.\n\nResult: [result.md](artifacts/goal/batches/repository-foundation/items/layout-contracts/result.md).","treeHash":"aa25f7382ad6a593da9dd85d7215608ed9e5933a","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":67584,"inputTokens":14467,"model":null,"outputTokens":5777,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":123279}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":6273,"hash":"16489ffb1ded09524ab2d13bd93c0bd01c9c9a45ec4496162891dd6e0bfcba52","mediaType":"application/json","name":"decisions","path":"artifacts/goal/episodes/005/decisions.json"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"98b4506bef931d13","findings":[],"hash":"18508a7b680fe3f7ed4befd010ea9e31f89525e3907b65d4d00929fc8d766c54","nodeId":"4816feb4-ebcb-4c63-ac49-8f831a9c4c0b","outcome":"completed","summary":"Episode 5 is decided and written. The goal is complete and I set `finish` to true.\n\n**What I found.** The docs wave merged at trunk `d8f2e544`, and all five handed results report success with no discrepancies. I cloned that trunk and verified it myself on Node 24.21.0. Every file in the planned layout exists, there are no stray files, and the working tree is clean.\n\n| Check on trunk d8f2e544 | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| `npm test` (node:test, offline) | 56 pass, 0 fail |\n| CLI table vs `examples/expected.txt` | byte-for-byte match |\n| CLI `--json` (flag before and after path) vs `examples/expected.json` | byte-for-byte match |\n| README input and output blocks vs committed examples | identical |\n| `--help`, no args, missing file, malformed JSON, nine-field validation failure, empty array | exit codes and stderr/stdout behavior as specified |\n| Importing `src/index.ts` | no output, exports the three public functions |\n| package.json, LICENSE, imports | no dependencies, no build, MIT, only `node:` and relative imports |\n\n**What I decided.** No new batch. A further read-only check worker would only repeat my verification and would consume the last episode, so the decisions file spawns nothing, requests the five known results for the write-up, and finishes. The notes carry the trunk commit, the verified evidence, the rubric, the citations to use, and an honest list of limitations for the write-up: the example is an L2BEAT snapshot read 2026-10-27 and not re-verified live, the documented modeling caveats (regular-path exit windows, council Safe only, Base's hybrid proof system recorded as fraud, Scroll's team multisig, ZKsync and Starknet inclusion paths), the validator worker tested on Node 22, and the README shows the table output while the JSON output lives in the committed example file.\n\n**Output.** `artifacts/goal/episodes/005/decisions.json` is one JSON object in the reference shape, with notes under the 8,000-character limit. It is excluded from Git by the repository's own exclude rules, so it stays untracked for the daemon to upload. The scratch clone under `test/scratch/` is also excluded and needs no cleanup. The untracked dotfiles in git status are sandbox masks, not files I created.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":792919,"inputTokens":514,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":14409,"runtime":"claude","turns":24,"wallClockMs":201793}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":14833,"hash":"b026b7026f9c75a79fcffbb5c196aa13afc5122057a925fb4f3a619a1b4ff123","mediaType":"application/json","name":"decisions","path":"artifacts/goal/episodes/002/decisions.json"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"98b4506bef931d13","findings":[],"hash":"2d22d29ad2cd4255c665c4516c086cc5404f4a20d464d7bb69ee66ad96f2915d","nodeId":"497d6f6d-da60-443e-bfe7-144f1880495e","outcome":"completed","summary":"Episode 2 decisions are written to `artifacts/goal/episodes/002/decisions.json`, the only file created. It is one JSON object in the reference shape, validated by parsing, and git status shows nothing else changed.\n\n**What the inputs showed.** The foundation wave merged cleanly at trunk commit 74367a1 with package.json, LICENSE, src/types.ts and docs/architecture.md holding the frozen contracts. The facts research delivered a complete, evidenced JSON for all six rollups with caveats, and no field is missing or a stand-in. Nothing was running, so this episode had to launch work.\n\n**What the decision does.** It spawns one code wave named core-implementation with five disjoint items, each one component with its own tests where applicable:\n\n- validator: src/validate.ts and test/validation.test.ts\n- scoring: src/score.ts, src/rank.ts and their two test files\n- cli: src/cli.ts, src/index.ts and test/cli.test.ts\n- example-input: examples/rollups.json with the researched values verbatim\n- example-sources: docs/example-sources.md with the L2BEAT caveats\n\nEach filled brief is under 3,000 characters and tells the worker exactly what its result must contain. README, the expected example output and its test are held back on purpose so they can be generated by the real CLI on the merged trunk in episode 3. The next episode reads all five results plus the facts report again, wakes when the wave merges or after 120 minutes, and finish is false.\n\n**Notes carry forward** the trunk state, the six-rollup values, hand-computed cross-check scores (Arbitrum One 85 down to Scroll 45, no ties), and the plan for episodes 3 through 6: a docs-and-output wave with a scope-empty verification item, then fix waves, then finish only on a verification report showing passing tests and matching README output. Budget after this episode is 7 of 20 items used.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":550501,"inputTokens":322,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":20176,"runtime":"claude","turns":15,"wallClockMs":242453}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":3477,"hash":"2d9039deb9f22f2c749ec0214bf25528c21f5366ba65987a190bf35d4d3db665","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/docs-and-examples-repair/items/readme/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"318f8d255167182a26dd051aaae22adae5094dae05c9facf4005f0285b067001","device":"0256823ae36e7900","findings":[],"hash":"443b505e6dca2b6b671510d995cb80fb2af69e1ea53a913fd87ea0503c651dfb","nodeId":"7042007a-eba2-4aa6-a576-054afefd7223","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [README.md](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/08edf14a-e121-4154-b4cf-5d63970ae27b/7042007a-eba2-4aa6-a576-054afefd7223/README.md) and the required [report](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/08edf14a-e121-4154-b4cf-5d63970ae27b/7042007a-eba2-4aa6-a576-054afefd7223/artifacts/goal/batches/docs-and-examples-repair/items/readme/result.md).\n\nNode 24 verification: **46 tests and 12 documentation checks passed**. Example scores and table output match exactly. Base’s labeling inconsistency is documented; checks against concurrent example files are deferred until merge.","treeHash":"0f6c6c20527fc93200b1b5fb1f09db2ad81a2377","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":405888,"inputTokens":34681,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":13023,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":344416}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":15087,"hash":"e5632eb90603f5b28af0374a612424779a8597f97be6e94da482bb5d7fac1a0e","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"468e82a89b9bfe18","findings":[],"hash":"47342ead015d6c938b6d816ae5f3413a5e8d119028581a9b8216499160e8b3d8","nodeId":"cd016735-c85f-4e6a-85b7-bc6eccea211c","outcome":"completed","summary":"Those dotfile entries are character devices owned by nobody, dated before this task: the sandbox masks them with `/dev/null` mounts, so they are not files I created and will not be in the workspace outside the sandbox. Nothing to clean up. The deliverable is complete.\n\n**Done.** The write-up is at `artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md` (15,087 bytes, under the 20,000 limit, left untracked for the daemon to upload). Nothing else in the workspace was changed; my clone of the trunk lives under `test/scratch/`, which is discarded.\n\n**What the report says.** It names the repository and the final trunk commit `d8f2e544`, walks the nineteen tracked files one by one, lays out the seven-factor rubric and the ranking rule, shows the six-rollup example input with its scores and the exact table the CLI prints, gives the run commands for the tool and the library, and tables the test suites. It cites the five handed results plus the foundation wave and the research batch, and closes with the limits: the snapshot is from L2BEAT on 2026-10-27 and was not re-verified live, the Base proof label and other modeling simplifications, no npm publish, no tsconfig or CI by design.\n\n**What I verified myself before writing it.** On a fresh clone of commit `d8f2e544` with Node 22.23.3:\n\n- `npm test` passed 56 of 56 (validation 24, scoring 10, ranking 5, cli 7, examples 10).\n- The CLI table and both `--json` positions matched the committed fixtures byte for byte.\n- `--help` exited 0, no argument exited 1 with usage on stderr, a nine-error row exited 1 with one stderr line per issue and empty stdout, an empty array gave a header-only table and `[]`.\n- Importing the entry point printed nothing and exported exactly the three functions.\n- `package.json` has no dependencies and no build script, and every import is a `node:` built-in or a relative path.\n\n**Next.** A judge from another wallet reads the report against the goal. If it comes back with findings that need code changes, the recorded plan is one narrowly scoped code wave followed by a scope-less recheck.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":679813,"inputTokens":354,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":13044,"runtime":"claude","turns":20,"wallClockMs":179524}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"06a310a5c144dce3","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Section 'How to run the tool' and the 'What is missing or limited' bullet about Node versions. src/cli.ts guards its entry point with `if (import.meta.main)`. Per the Node 24 ESM documentation (https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v24.x/api/esm.html#importmetamain), import.meta.main was 'Added in: v24.2.0' and is Stability 1.0 (early development). On Node 24.0.x and 24.1.x it is undefined, so `node src/cli.ts examples/rollups.json` prints nothing and exits 0, `--help` prints nothing, and `npm test` fails 9 of 56 tests (all 7 CLI tests and both example CLI fixture tests). package.json declares `\"engines\": { \"node\": \">=24\" }` and the README says 'use a current Node.js 24.x release or later', so these releases are inside the advertised support range. The report's limits section says only that the trunk was not verified 'on every Node 24 patch release' and that 'Type stripping is a Node feature'; it does not say the CLI depends on an experimental API that the first Node 24 releases lack. A guard that also works on those releases (for example comparing `process.argv[1]` to the module path) or an engines range of `>=24.2` with a matching README note would fix this.","line":97,"path":"artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md","reproduction":"Download https://nodejs.org/dist/v24.1.0/node-v24.1.0-linux-x64.tar.xz, extract, then in a clone of commit d8f2e544: `<node24.1>/bin/node src/cli.ts examples/rollups.json` -> expected the 7-line ranked table and exit 0; actual: empty stdout (only an ExperimentalWarning on stderr), exit 0. `<node24.1>/bin/node --input-type=module -e 'console.log(import.meta.main)'` prints `undefined`. `<node24.1>/bin/node --test test/*.test.ts` -> expected 56 pass; actual 'tests 56, pass 47, fail 9' with failures 'prints a ranked table', 'prints ranked JSON with --json before or after the path', 'prints help without reading an input file', 'reports file and JSON parsing failures only on stderr', 'reports every validation issue only on stderr', 'prints only the table header for an empty array', 'importing the public entrypoint has no output or CLI side effects', 'CLI table output equals expected.txt byte for byte', 'CLI JSON output equals expected.json byte for byte, flag on either side'. On Node 24.22.1 the same commands give the table and 56/56.","severity":"medium","snippet":"Clone the repository and use Node 24 or newer. Nothing to install, nothing to build.","title":"CLI is a silent no-op on Node 24.0.x and 24.1.x, which the package's engines range and the report's 'Node 24 or newer' claim include"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Section 'The example and its output', and the README 'Six-rollup snapshot' / examples/rollups.json / docs/example-sources.md. The report says the snapshot was 'read from L2BEAT on 2026-10-27' and docs/example-sources.md says `upgrades` records 'the council Safe's own signing threshold'. The cited source https://l2beat.com/scaling/projects/zksync-era (fetched 2026-10-27) states the Security Council has '8 representatives of different orgs' with thresholds '4/8 to approve upgrades · 3/8 soft freeze · 6/8 hard freeze, unfreeze and emergency approval', and that the standard upgrade path ends with 'approval by the Guardians or 4 SecurityCouncil participants'. The goal's field is the threshold of the council that can upgrade the rollup, and 6/8 is the emergency-approval and freeze threshold, not the upgrade-approval threshold. The same row records the regular-path exit window (5 days), so it mixes the regular path for one field with the emergency path for another, contrary to the sources document's own 'exit windows are regular-path values' rule. The other five rows match their L2BEAT pages (Arbitrum One 9/12 and 10d, OP Mainnet 10/13 and no exit window, Base 8/11, Starknet 9/12 and 7d, Scroll 3-of-4 multisig). With the source's 4/8 the upgrades factor gives 5 points instead of 15, ZKsync Era totals 40 instead of 50 and drops below Scroll (45), so the README's expected table, examples/expected.txt, examples/expected.json and the report's table are all wrong against the cited source. docs/example-sources.md already states that 'None' of the values were corroborated against L2BEAT, which the report mentions only as the example possibly going 'stale'.","line":76,"path":"artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md","reproduction":"Check: open https://l2beat.com/scaling/projects/zksync-era, Governance profile table, Security Council row: '4/8 to approve upgrades · 3/8 soft freeze · 6/8 hard freeze, unfreeze and emergency approval'. Claim as written: examples/rollups.json ZKsync Era `\"upgrades\": { \"type\": \"securityCouncil\", \"threshold\": 6, \"members\": 8 }`, score 50, rank 5. Then copy examples/rollups.json, change the ZKsync Era threshold from 6 to 4, and run `node src/cli.ts <copy>`: actual output ranks Scroll 5th with 45 and ZKsync Era 6th with 40; `--json` reason for its upgrades factor is 'Security council with threshold 4 of 8: ratio below 2/3 earns 5 points.' Expected: example data that matches the L2BEAT page it cites, with the README table and fixtures regenerated to match.","severity":"medium","snippet":"| ZKsync Era | 0 | validity | false | 5 | council 6/8 | blobs | false | 50 |","title":"ZKsync Era example row uses council 6/8, but the cited L2BEAT page gives 4/8 for approving upgrades; corrected row scores 40 and ranks last, changing the README output and both fixtures"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Section 'What is missing or limited' and the 'package.json' row of the file table. The goal asks for an open-source TypeScript library and CLI. package.json declares `\"exports\": \"./src/index.ts\"` and `\"bin\": { \"rollup-risk\": \"./src/cli.ts\" }`, which the report presents as the package's library and CLI entry points. Node's type stripping is disabled for files under node_modules (ERR_UNSUPPORTED_NODE_MODULES_TYPE_STRIPPING), so once the package is installed from a tarball, Git URL or the registry, both `import 'rollup-risk'` and the `rollup-risk` bin crash on load with Node 24.22.1. The report says the package is 'not published' and 'meant to be run from a source checkout' but does not say that the exports and bin fields it lists are unusable from node_modules under the no-build constraint, nor does the README warn against `npm install`-ing it. Either the report and README should state this limit plainly, or the package metadata should not advertise entry points that cannot load.","line":152,"path":"artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md","reproduction":"In a clone of d8f2e544 on Node 24.22.1: `npm pack` (produces rollup-risk-0.1.0.tgz), then in an empty directory `npm init -y && npm install ./rollup-risk-0.1.0.tgz`, create use.mjs containing `import { scoreRollup } from 'rollup-risk'; console.log(typeof scoreRollup);` and run `node use.mjs`. Expected: prints 'function'. Actual: exit 1 with 'Error [ERR_UNSUPPORTED_NODE_MODULES_TYPE_STRIPPING]: Stripping types is currently unsupported for files under node_modules, for \".../node_modules/rollup-risk/src/index.ts\"'. `./node_modules/.bin/rollup-risk --help` fails the same way for src/cli.ts instead of printing the usage line.","severity":"low","snippet":"- The package is not published to npm and is meant to be run from a source checkout. There is no `tsconfig`, linter or CI configuration, by design: the requirement was no dependencies and no build step.","title":"package.json exports and bin point at .ts files that Node refuses to type-strip under node_modules, so the package cannot be imported or run after any npm install"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Section 'What is missing or limited' and the README 'Six-rollup snapshot' caveats. The report admits the wave-4 brief 'wrongly called it a validity label', yet the shipped README still tells readers: 'The supplied notes describe Base's validity label as a simplification of its hybrid TEE/ZK system, while the supplied input row specifies \"fraud\" ... that equality does not resolve the difference in descriptions.' docs/example-sources.md repeats it ('the brief calls this a \"validity label\"'). A reader of the open-source repository has no 'supplied notes' or 'brief' to consult, and the cited source https://l2beat.com/scaling/projects/base (fetched 2026-10-27) labels Base's state validation 'Fraud proofs (1R, ZK)' with a 5-day challenge period, so the `fraud` row agrees with L2BEAT and there is no unresolved label disagreement to caveat. The README should drop the reference to internal notes and state the L2BEAT label directly (fraud proofs with a TEE arm and a ZK arm since the 2026 Azul upgrade).","line":148,"path":"artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md","reproduction":"Check: README.md 'Six-rollup snapshot' third caveat bullet and docs/example-sources.md 'Base's proof label is simplified' bullet. Claim as written: 'The supplied notes describe Base's validity label as a simplification of its hybrid TEE/ZK system' and 'the brief calls this a \"validity label\"'. Source: https://l2beat.com/scaling/projects/base says 'Fraud proofs (1R, ZK)', '5d challenge period', with the Azul multiproof system of a TEE arm and an SP1 ZK arm; it does not describe a validity-proof label. Expected: a caveat that refers only to the cited source and states that L2BEAT itself classes Base as fraud proofs; actual: a caveat that cites documents absent from the repository and asserts a label conflict the source does not contain.","severity":"low","snippet":"- Known modeling simplifications, all documented in the README and the sources document: exit windows are regular-path values and all six rollups have emergency paths with no window; council thresholds describe the council Safe alone and leave out co-signers; Base is recorded as `fraud` with permissionless proving although L2BEAT describes a hybrid TEE plus ZK system since June 2026 (the orchestrator's wave-4 brief wrongly called it a validity label, both docs workers noted the mismatch, and either label earns the same 20 points); Scroll is upgraded by a 3-of-4 team multisig since 2026-06-01 and can disable enforced batches, so its `forceInclusion: true` is conditional; ZKsync Era's priority queue and Starknet's council minority are not counted as forced inclusion.","title":"README's Base caveat cites 'supplied notes' and a 'validity label' that are not in the repository and that the cited L2BEAT page contradicts"}],"hash":"503ff28f3658d778b148765c301c05c0bc505944826a40b67d5c2530fc1cd58a","nodeId":"0dadbd90-1cd3-437d-bf28-2b607615c89d","outcome":"completed","summary":"Only a harness-created `.claude` folder remains in the excluded scratch path, which git ignores. The review is complete.\n\n**Outcome:** the deliverable largely meets the goal. The repository at commit d8f2e544 runs with no dependencies, passes 56 of 56 tests on Node 24.22.1, and its CLI output matches the committed fixtures byte for byte. The README, MIT license, validator, seven scoring factors, and ranking all behave as the report describes. I found no high-severity defect. Four substantiated findings are in `.imd-findings.json`:\n\n- **Medium: CLI is a silent no-op on Node 24.0 and 24.1.** The entry guard uses `import.meta.main`, which Node added in 24.2.0 as an experimental API. On Node 24.1.0 the CLI prints nothing and exits 0, and 9 of 56 tests fail. The package declares engines `>=24` and the report says \"Node 24 or newer\" without disclosing this dependency.\n- **Medium: ZKsync Era example row contradicts its cited source.** The row records a 6 of 8 council, but the L2BEAT page states \"4/8 to approve upgrades\" and reserves 6/8 for freezes and emergency approval. With the source's threshold ZKsync Era scores 40 instead of 50 and ranks last, which changes the README table and both fixtures. The other five rollups match their L2BEAT pages.\n- **Low: package metadata advertises entry points that cannot load after install.** Node refuses to strip types under node_modules, so after `npm pack` and install, both importing the library and running the bin fail with ERR_UNSUPPORTED_NODE_MODULES_TYPE_STRIPPING. The report only says the package is \"not published\".\n- **Low: README's Base caveat cites internal \"supplied notes\" and a \"validity label\"** that are not in the repository. L2BEAT itself labels Base as fraud proofs with a ZK arm, so the row is correct and the caveat describes a conflict the source does not contain.\n\nEach finding cites the report line, the claim as written, the source consulted, and a concrete reproduction. No repository files were changed. The scratch clone and downloaded Node binary used for verification were deleted.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1442115,"inputTokens":866,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":29154,"runtime":"claude","turns":51,"wallClockMs":536646}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":1779,"hash":"81dd84769ef7837f23f148093c3e86caf8ef7024f453655444861a937dad1d07","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/implementation/items/scoring/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"56510f95544ea36a6b8bb8f9931fc73abe885c234b20b9808b59fd848c92ff34","device":"00d1489b4a4cf02f","findings":[],"hash":"732b06dbafa646627d2ee7c135f4573482108ea06c979e8423e233d122bae926","nodeId":"6ae2f5ed-0ae5-4f8f-bb39-46d30c6a0311","outcome":"completed","summary":"I wrote the scorer and ranker and their tests, and all 15 tests pass under Node 24. I did not commit anything.\n\n- **`src/score.ts`**: `scoreRollup(rollup)` scores the seven factors in the order and with the rules in `docs/architecture.md`, and returns a total from 0 to 100. Each factor's reason names the value it saw and the rule it applied. Council thresholds are compared by cross-multiplying rather than dividing, as the architecture doc recommends.\n- **`src/rank.ts`**: `rankRollups(rollups)` ranks by score from highest to lowest, then by name (plain string comparison). Rollups that tie on both keep their input order. Ranks run 1..n, an empty list returns `[]`, and the caller's list is never changed.\n- **`test/scoring.test.ts`** (10 tests) covers:\n  - every branch of each factor;\n  - the exit-window boundaries 0, 6.99, 7, 29.99 and 30 days;\n  - the council cases 1/1, 1/12, 2/3, 3/4, 7/12 and 12/12;\n  - the rule that permissionless proving only counts when proofs are live;\n  - totals of 0 and 100, the factor order, and the maximum points adding up to 100.\n- **`test/ranking.test.ts`** (5 tests) covers the ordering, the name tie-break, exact ties keeping their order, ranks 1..n, empty input, and not changing the input.\n\n**Checks run:**\n- `node --test test/scoring.test.ts test/ranking.test.ts`: 15 passed, 0 failed.\n- `node src/score.ts` and `node src/rank.ts`: both load without errors.\n\nThese files only depend on `src/types.ts`, so missing sibling modules didn't block anything. I didn't run the full `npm test` because the other workers' test files aren't in this checkout yet. Nothing deviates from `docs/architecture.md`.\n\nThe required result file is at `artifacts/goal/batches/implementation/items/scoring/result.md`, left untracked. The checkout also has untracked files I didn't create, such as `.bashrc`, `.gitmodules`, `.claude/` and `.idea`; I left them alone.","treeHash":"91f69c608576e188c663ef693e24ff8c8807fa5b","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":126153,"inputTokens":12,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":7329,"runtime":"claude","turns":6,"wallClockMs":61594}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":2322,"hash":"45aef12d87ee4bdb07d770c0399168557f06bd5fcda6f5647219e37e23acdc11","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/implementation/items/cli/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"c7d2a7a0d3293ca000ca1be2016bc976712e1ed41fcb684987efe2c4ac6a82da","device":"0116c8455d2c62d4","findings":[],"hash":"821a46d3e033645a83da2556236ce082e4511766db2a52bfab8bb5ea465fabfa","nodeId":"bceb9a65-6574-4717-b5b8-03f9b8ae3322","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented CLI, public entrypoint, and CLI subprocess tests.\n\nFiles written:\n- `src/cli.ts` (executable)\n- `src/index.ts`\n- `test/cli.test.ts`\n- `artifacts/goal/batches/implementation/items/cli/result.md`\n\nSyntax checks passed on Node v24.21.0. Full CLI tests are blocked because sibling-owned `src/rank.ts` and `src/validate.ts` are not yet present; the result file records exact failures and commands.","treeHash":"4528a2b4b159377d544bd6733e01d492542fc401","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":307200,"inputTokens":45055,"model":null,"outputTokens":10189,"runtime":"codex","turns":7,"wallClockMs":260190}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":18926,"hash":"f9319036bec71f999b60fca72ebd5edbe02f2a9115afd0109e24061c4fad727c","mediaType":"application/json","name":"decisions","path":"artifacts/goal/episodes/002/decisions.json"}],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"468e82a89b9bfe18","findings":[],"hash":"bccc8900307cdab8723a10f6614336c37c412363dd08c631ca9520ebbfd0c05a","nodeId":"497d6f6d-da60-443e-bfe7-144f1880495e","outcome":"completed","summary":"The decisions file for episode 2 is written at `artifacts/goal/episodes/002/decisions.json` and passes every shape limit the previous attempt broke.\n\n**What the inputs showed.** The foundation wave merged cleanly: package configuration, MIT license, runtime-empty types and a frozen architecture document are in the trunk. The research item delivered evidenced L2BEAT facts for all six rollups with no stand-ins. Under the frozen rubric those facts score Arbitrum One 85, OP Mainnet 75, Base 70, Starknet 65, ZKsync Era 50 and Scroll 45, which I recorded in the notes for later verification.\n\n**What I decided.** Two code waves that queue one after the other, spending 6 of the 18 remaining item slots:\n\n- **implementation** wave, three disjoint items: validator, scorer plus ranker, and CLI plus public entrypoint. Each brief points the worker at the trunk's architecture document, forbids any file outside its scope, and demands a result with files, exports, commands and pass/fail counts.\n- **example-docs** wave, run after the first merges so the real CLI exists: an example item that generates the expected output files byte for byte from the actual CLI, a README item that pastes real output, and an empty-scope check item that runs the whole test suite, every CLI path, every rubric branch and the dependency-free checks and reports findings as expected versus actual.\n\nThe next episode wakes when both waves settle or after six hours, reads all six results, and either runs a final recheck before finishing or dispatches scoped fix items. Notes carry the facts, expected scores, research caveats and the contingency plan.\n\n**Why the last attempt failed and what changed.** It put specs over 1000 characters into item vars. This file keeps every var under 1000 characters and every filled brief under 3000, which is why the docs work became a separate batch with its own shorter brief and two items instead of one. All measurements were asserted by the build script before writing, and the output parsed back as one JSON object with the expected keys.\n\nOne thing to note: the git status check at the end failed only because the sandbox blocks the user's gitconfig. The deliverable itself is untracked under `artifacts/` as the task requires, and nothing else in the workspace was changed outside the scratch folder.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":936877,"inputTokens":386,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":40371,"runtime":"claude","turns":16,"wallClockMs":444433}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":2426,"hash":"77cafdb9afa7e237039cf0dcdf6e8aab2d984d0b9c73222ac406e25b36235c53","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/docs-and-examples-repair/items/example/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"a6d422e9ea720f9ba52bae73aae8b93d0e42cc690f94e09c73f123920cdd6af2","device":"01695e9524859621","findings":[],"hash":"bcfefec3b3a8bfc7cd3b94cf3468623d2639810f0d72fda23e632ba2d3a7478e","nodeId":"462c6272-2bc7-4f52-a610-0981492c99dc","outcome":"completed","summary":"The six-rollup example is in place, and its scores and ranking match the brief: Arbitrum One 85, OP Mainnet 75, Base 70, Starknet 65, ZKsync Era 50, Scroll 45. The new tests and `npm test` both pass.\n\n**Changed files** (all inside the allowed paths):\n- `examples/rollups.json`: the six rows as supplied, in the given order and key order, with two-space indentation.\n- `examples/expected.txt` and `examples/expected.json`: made by running the CLI on the example, once for the table and once with `--json`.\n- `test/examples.test.ts`: 10 offline tests. They check that all six rows validate, the scores, the ranking, and that the CLI output equals both fixture files exactly, including the trailing newline.\n- `docs/example-sources.md`: where the dated snapshot came from, the six public L2BEAT project links, how each field was filled in, and all the caveats from the brief. It says plainly that every value is a supplied fact and none was checked against L2BEAT.\n\n**Checks run**\n- `node --test test/examples.test.ts`: 10 passed, 0 failed.\n- `npm test`: 56 passed, 0 failed (46 existing tests plus the 10 new ones).\n- I also worked each total out by hand from the scoring rules in `docs/architecture.md`.\n\n**Discrepancy in the brief:** one caveat says Base's \"validity label\" simplifies its hybrid TEE/ZK system, but Base's supplied row says fraud proofs with permissionless proving. I kept the row as supplied, because the stated score of 70 needs permissionless proving to be true. The sources doc notes the mismatch. Fraud and validity proofs score the same 20 points, so the total doesn't change either way.\n\n**Deferred until the wave merges:**\n- Checking the example against the README, which is being written at the same time.\n- Re-running `npm test` on the merged code. If the wording of the scoring explanations changes, regenerate the two fixture files with the same two CLI commands.\n\nThe report is at `artifacts/goal/batches/docs-and-examples-repair/items/example/result.md` and is left untracked.","treeHash":"c119802be835e351ae38cafdc1f3e0f3e3d432cf","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":188222,"inputTokens":14,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":7922,"runtime":"claude","turns":8,"wallClockMs":76967}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":22392,"hash":"04f43c473ae7b643a70e09c0bab6266f15d6dd13c5752c2790cc91099dfebf52","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/example-facts/items/six-rollups/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"1ca477e8d9b58040","findings":[],"hash":"bd000ffb1f5ab7214399f8da1d0582d036a25ecd35ef04e45d674a83169bf426","nodeId":"21f190d7-700b-4e2b-acc5-b0542a9358c4","outcome":"completed","summary":"I've written the research report to `artifacts/goal/batches/example-facts/items/six-rollups/result.md`. It is 22,392 bytes, under the 32,000-byte limit, and its JSON block parses as six entries.\n\nEverything comes from the public L2BEAT project pages and summary page, which I read on 2026-10-27. I did not fetch any primary project documentation, so every fact is reported as L2BEAT presents it. My fetch tool returned summaries and short quotes rather than the full pages, so quoted wording should be spot-checked against the live pages before it goes into the docs.\n\n**Results (L2BEAT stage, proof system, permissionless proving, regular-path exit window, upgrade control, data location, forced inclusion):**\n\n| Rollup | Stage | Proof | Permissionless proving | Exit window | Upgrades | Data | Force inclusion |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Arbitrum One | 1 | fraud | yes | 10 days | security council 9/12 | blobs | yes |\n| OP Mainnet | 1 | fraud | yes | 0 | security council 10/13 | blobs | yes |\n| Base | 1 | fraud | yes* | 0 | security council 8/11 | blobs | yes |\n| ZKsync Era | 0 | validity | no | 5 days | security council 6/8 | blobs | no |\n| Starknet | 1 | validity | no | 7 days | security council 9/12 | blobs | no |\n| Scroll | 0 | validity | no | 0 | multisig | blobs | yes* |\n\n*Base's ZK proofs are open to anyone, but its TEE (trusted hardware) prover allowlist is permissioned. Scroll's 7-day forced-inclusion route can be switched off instantly by its 3-of-4 team multisig, which replaced its security council on 2026-06-01.\n\nEvery field has evidence, so the report includes the candidate JSON array, nothing is left unresolved, and none of the values are placeholders. It also has per-fact source links, text ready for `docs/example-sources.md`, and a list of things to recheck.\n\n**Judgement calls you should know about:**\n- **Exit window:** I used L2BEAT's regular-upgrade-path figure. For all six, an emergency upgrade route leaves users no time to exit. OP Mainnet and Base pass L2BEAT's Stage 1 \"7 days to exit\" check only because the security council must co-sign, so I set their exit window to 0.\n- **Security council co-signers:** the schema records only the council's own threshold. OP needs the Optimism Foundation, Base needs Coinbase's 3-of-6 multisig, and ZKsync's emergency route needs two other bodies. On Starknet, a 2-of-4 StarkWare multisig can instantly upgrade most bridges outside the core contract.\n- **Inconsistent L2BEAT figures:** Arbitrum shows 10 days in one place and about 17.4 in another, ZKsync 5 vs about 4, Starknet 7 vs 8. I used the risk-section values.\n- **To recheck before publishing:**\n  - ZKsync's council size of 6/8, since older sources said 12 members.\n  - Scroll's recent council removal.\n  - Base's proof setup since June 2026, which combines TEE and ZK proofs.\n\nThere are untracked dotfiles and config files in the workspace root that I didn't create, and I left them alone.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":212545,"inputTokens":594168,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":42290,"runtime":"claude","turns":16,"wallClockMs":177480}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4922,"hash":"86e2f9a19c1ff0f5422af89195f98f828f05f7b88a720cc100185d8adbb0044e","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/batches/implementation/items/validator/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"a8b4de062afbf77ade6b5e6be1d3e9d9c2dbb78a3cfeacd28056b0348e7dc8d8","device":"00920b27421b9a80","findings":[],"hash":"d99db77c114d252c01bb2e649087229e743c333a285cb800ed8cd2c7fc52362d","nodeId":"33153738-9ccd-41d8-856f-646bc35ff99f","outcome":"completed","summary":"I've written the input validator for rollup-risk in `src/validate.ts` and its tests in `test/validation.test.ts`. All 24 tests pass, but only on Node 22.23.2 — Node 24 isn't on this machine.\n\n**What it does:** `validateRollups(input)` checks the input against the rules in `docs/architecture.md` and `src/types.ts`. It doesn't stop at the first problem: every bad field in every row is reported, with paths like `$[2].upgrades.threshold`. If something that should hold other fields has the wrong type, it reports that one error and doesn't invent errors for what's inside. Valid input comes back as a new array holding the same objects, unchanged.\n\n**Checks run:**\n- `node --test test/validation.test.ts`: 24 tests, 24 pass, 0 fail.\n- `node src/validate.ts`: loads cleanly, exit 0.\n\nThe first test run had 2 failures, both mistakes in my tests rather than the validator. I fixed the tests and added one more check for inherited fields.\n\n**What couldn't run:**\n- The full test command, `npm test`, wasn't run because the other modules (scoring, ranking, the tool) belong to other workers and aren't in this checkout yet. The validator doesn't depend on them.\n- Nothing was tested on Node 24.\n\n**Two choices the spec left open:**\n- Rows must be plain objects (built from `{}`, `JSON.parse` output, or a null prototype). Things like dates, maps and class instances are rejected as the wrong type, as your brief asked.\n- A valid name still counts toward duplicate detection even if its row has other errors.\n\nThere are no deviations from `docs/architecture.md`. I didn't commit anything. The checkout also has untracked dotfiles at the root (`.bashrc`, `.gitmodules`, `.claude/` and others) that I didn't create; I left them alone, and they shouldn't go into the submission.\n\nFiles are in `artifacts/goal/batches/implementation/items/validator`:\n- result.md","treeHash":"c8026559e24be9ac3d91246ed8f5f215c875c9a3","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":223429,"inputTokens":16,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":15752,"runtime":"claude","turns":9,"wallClockMs":129066}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":10208,"hash":"5dfa2d65c8564c9390f280edfef3134f23885cd089e9363fd78ab8066992c814","mediaType":"application/json","name":"decisions","path":"artifacts/goal/episodes/004/decisions.json"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"35c52a5b502e847c","findings":[],"hash":"dcaa83af88139e9db34826807602a1f56184d05157e6ee1d279d0dbe0223a022","nodeId":"0934079d-9ce9-4fb3-9f1b-bdcf8622a01a","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created and validated [decisions.json](/home/identitymd5/.identitymd/work/08edf14a-e121-4154-b4cf-5d63970ae27b/0934079d-9ce9-4fb3-9f1b-bdcf8622a01a/artifacts/goal/episodes/004/decisions.json).\n\nSchedules two scoped documentation workers and records final verification steps. Checks passed; the file remains untracked.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":98688,"inputTokens":23206,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":7990,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":297333}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":13353,"hash":"ac6b5b04c57946ad4bfa519924685560f3228c5969b54ee5c745a2761f970775","mediaType":"application/json","name":"decisions","path":"artifacts/goal/episodes/001/decisions.json"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"35c52a5b502e847c","findings":[],"hash":"f0db74fedd098ea987bad29fbf705dc57b834368f1f47cf6eef784750e610917","nodeId":"7a9cdfbd-73dd-4842-bc4f-6fa7c7f1e394","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created and validated [decisions.json](/home/identitymd5/.identitymd/work/08edf14a-e121-4154-b4cf-5d63970ae27b/7a9cdfbd-73dd-4842-bc4f-6fa7c7f1e394/artifacts/goal/episodes/001/decisions.json).\n\nIt defines two initial batches: repository foundation and six-rollup fact research. Only the required file was written, and it remains untracked.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":107264,"inputTokens":18404,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":8627,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":370604}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":8275,"hash":"1e7b16305474917185128a2355062fcc9b7fc8b0810aa84b011b2e6d21f873f3","mediaType":"application/json","name":"decisions","path":"artifacts/goal/episodes/003/decisions.json"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3f6a9bdd601cb99f","findings":[],"hash":"fbaa5361282e5c67aa4cd40b24f39e0749cdc060d81a58d5304e8e482801c230","nodeId":"fac3599f-c714-4ce8-8e6c-2dc550d01e8f","outcome":"completed","summary":"Nothing further is needed. The deliverable is written and verified, so this is the closing recap.\n\n**Outcome.** The episode 3 decisions file exists at `artifacts/goal/episodes/003/decisions.json`, untracked, as one JSON object in the skill's shape. It spawns one code wave, names two results to read, wakes on that wave, and sets finish to false.\n\n**What I found.** The implementation wave merged cleanly at trunk commit 2ee4c6a with all three items accepted. I cloned that trunk and verified it on Node 24.22.1 rather than trusting the reports:\n\n| Check | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| npm test | 46 pass, 0 fail |\n| Six-rollup example through the CLI | Arbitrum One 85, OP Mainnet 75, Base 70, Starknet 65, ZKsync Era 50, Scroll 45 |\n| --json on either side, --help, bad input, empty input | All behave as the architecture specifies |\n| Importing src/index.ts | No output, exports the three functions |\n| Dependencies | None, only node: and relative imports |\n\nThe code is done. What remains is the README, the example input with generated expected output, the sources document and the example test. Last episode's docs wave was refused only because the implementation wave was still running.\n\n**What I decided.** One code batch named docs-examples with two disjoint items:\n\n- **example** writes examples/rollups.json in canonical form, generates expected.txt and expected.json from the real CLI, writes docs/example-sources.md with the L2BEAT caveats, and adds test/examples.test.ts comparing CLI output byte for byte.\n- **readme** writes README.md with the scoring method, schema, API, usage, the same canonical JSON example and the CLI's verbatim output.\n\nBoth briefs carry the fixed facts, the expected scores and an instruction to stop and report if the CLI prints anything else. Every filled brief is under 3,000 characters and every var under 1,000, enforced by the script that wrote the file. I dropped a separate read-only check item this wave since I verified the trunk myself, leaving 13 of 20 item slots.\n\n**Next episode.** Read docs-examples/example and docs-examples/readme. If both merged green, spawn a single scope-empty final check on the merged trunk, then finish in episode 5. If anything failed, spawn disjoint fix items quoting the failing command and finish by episode 6. The notes in the decisions file spell this out, including the citations the write-up must carry.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":640745,"inputTokens":56,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":36482,"runtime":"claude","turns":20,"wallClockMs":396859}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"1236dae5913b9e3420643da40eb6c04705709729508e5ba6cec50963af8ee961","verifiedTreeHash":"aa25f7382ad6a593da9dd85d7215608ed9e5933a","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"18508a7b680fe3f7ed4befd010ea9e31f89525e3907b65d4d00929fc8d766c54","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"decisions: the output is not in the shape its task gives: spawn.0.items.1.vars.spec: Too big: expected string to have <=1000 characters; spawn.0.items.2.vars.spec: Too big: expected string to have <=1000 characters; spawn.0.items.3.vars.spec: Too big: expected string to have <=1000 characters","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"rejected","submissionHash":"2d22d29ad2cd4255c665c4516c086cc5404f4a20d464d7bb69ee66ad96f2915d","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"443b505e6dca2b6b671510d995cb80fb2af69e1ea53a913fd87ea0503c651dfb","verifiedTreeHash":"0f6c6c20527fc93200b1b5fb1f09db2ad81a2377","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"47342ead015d6c938b6d816ae5f3413a5e8d119028581a9b8216499160e8b3d8","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"732b06dbafa646627d2ee7c135f4573482108ea06c979e8423e233d122bae926","verifiedTreeHash":"91f69c608576e188c663ef693e24ff8c8807fa5b","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"821a46d3e033645a83da2556236ce082e4511766db2a52bfab8bb5ea465fabfa","verifiedTreeHash":"4528a2b4b159377d544bd6733e01d492542fc401","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"bccc8900307cdab8723a10f6614336c37c412363dd08c631ca9520ebbfd0c05a","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"bcfefec3b3a8bfc7cd3b94cf3468623d2639810f0d72fda23e632ba2d3a7478e","verifiedTreeHash":"c119802be835e351ae38cafdc1f3e0f3e3d432cf","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"bd000ffb1f5ab7214399f8da1d0582d036a25ecd35ef04e45d674a83169bf426","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"d99db77c114d252c01bb2e649087229e743c333a285cb800ed8cd2c7fc52362d","verifiedTreeHash":"c8026559e24be9ac3d91246ed8f5f215c875c9a3","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"dcaa83af88139e9db34826807602a1f56184d05157e6ee1d279d0dbe0223a022","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"f0db74fedd098ea987bad29fbf705dc57b834368f1f47cf6eef784750e610917","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"fbaa5361282e5c67aa4cd40b24f39e0749cdc060d81a58d5304e8e482801c230","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+260efc41"}]}